bpowa
04-08-2007, 06:09 PM
So I was riding today on 84, on our way to alices, we were behind a truck. My buddy infront passed a truck in the same lane to the left. He did it because the truck pulled slightly to the right and wave us by. I then passed also because the truck was waiting for me to pass. We did not go over the double yellow. Basically lane sharing.
Now I know there are limitations with lane sharing.. He wrote up up for plates which he said was not clear to see, but I can see it fine and everyone else. he also wrote us up for VC 21750.
"21750. The driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle or a bicycle proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left at a safe distance without interfering with the safe operation of the overtaken vehicle or bicycle, subject to the limitations and exceptions hereinafter stated."
It says I shall pass to the left without interfering with the safe operation of overtaken vehicle.
The guy let us pass. How do I prove it in court?
he noted that we were doing 60+ and safe was 45. This was a guestimate on his part.
Is this possible to win in court..
Can someone clarify this statement "subject to the limitations and exceptions hereinafter stated".
thanks
larry
Now I know there are limitations with lane sharing.. He wrote up up for plates which he said was not clear to see, but I can see it fine and everyone else. he also wrote us up for VC 21750.
"21750. The driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle or a bicycle proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left at a safe distance without interfering with the safe operation of the overtaken vehicle or bicycle, subject to the limitations and exceptions hereinafter stated."
It says I shall pass to the left without interfering with the safe operation of overtaken vehicle.
The guy let us pass. How do I prove it in court?
he noted that we were doing 60+ and safe was 45. This was a guestimate on his part.
Is this possible to win in court..
Can someone clarify this statement "subject to the limitations and exceptions hereinafter stated".
thanks
larry