pannayar
e^ipi+1=0
This thread/video claiming lane splitting is safer brings me to ask something I have always wondered.
Why not make the shoulder legal for motorcycles?
My thinking is that cars should not use the shoulder because an emergency vehicle (ambulance etc) may need to use it. There could be other purposes (pulling over on a breakdown) but that seems to be the main one to me. Motorcycles can always easily move out of the way from the shoulder (and it may decrease the dangers/stress for riders from heavy California traffic lane splitting), so why not?
Why not make the shoulder legal for motorcycles?
My thinking is that cars should not use the shoulder because an emergency vehicle (ambulance etc) may need to use it. There could be other purposes (pulling over on a breakdown) but that seems to be the main one to me. Motorcycles can always easily move out of the way from the shoulder (and it may decrease the dangers/stress for riders from heavy California traffic lane splitting), so why not?
Last edited:
