


Granted, she doesn't know much about guns, but the whole tone of how her article was viewed was predicated on the false perception that she was the NY times 'gun expert'.Gail Collins joined The New York Times in 1995 as a member of the editorial board and later as an Op-Ed columnist. In 2001 she became the first woman ever appointed editor of the Times’s editorial page. At the beginning of 2007, she stepped down and began a leave in order to finish her new book: "When Everything Changed: The Amazing Journey of American Women from 1960 to the Present." She returned to The Times as a columnist in July 2007.
Read More...
Before joining The Times, Ms. Collins was a columnist at New York Newsday and the New York Daily News, and a reporter for United Press International. Her first jobs in journalism were in Connecticut, where she founded the Connecticut State News Bureau, which provided coverage of the state capitol and Connecticut politics. When she sold it in 1977, the CSNB was the largest news service of its kind in the country, with more than 30 weekly and daily newspaper chains.
Besides "When Everything Changed," published in October of 2009 by Little, Brown, Ms. Collins is the author of "America's Women," "Scorpion Tongues: Gossip, Celebrity and American Politics," and "The Millennium Book," which she co-authored with her husband, Dan Collins.

The OP was full of fail.
Where did the OP get the idea that this was the NY times 'gun expert'?
Here's her bio:
Granted, she doesn't know much about guns, but the whole tone of how her article was viewed was predicated on the false perception that she was the NY times 'gun expert'.![]()
Hint: Finish your first cup of coffee before responding.So, you agree with everything that she wrote?
The OP was full of fail.
Granted, she doesn't know much about guns, but the whole tone of how her article was viewed was predicated on the false perception that she was the NY times 'gun expert'.![]()
Hint: Finish your first cup of coffee before responding.
You didn't read my comment, did you?
the outcry for ban starts.Loughner’s gun, a 9-millimeter Glock, is extremely easy to fire over and over, and it can carry a 30-bullet clip. It is “not suited for hunting or personal protection,” said Paul Helmke, the president of the Brady Campaign. “What it’s good for is killing and injuring a lot of people quickly.”
You mean like when the Rep Congress called for a ban on French Fries, Claim that health insurance rates are going to go up significantly because of 'Obamacare', etc.I'm on my second one, thank you very much.
The problem as I said is when people read
the outcry for ban starts.

Interesting target.Well, since GLOCKs are evil, I'll take my to the range today to kill lots of paper targets very quickly.
Like that.
![]()

some of you guys need to be careful. If they can't get your guns, they'll get your speech. Being a 2A supporter will someday lead to you being on a 'screened' list so you can't even buy a gun. This is what they are attacking now..."how did this guy buy a gun with speech and views like his?"
Interesting target.
What distance were you shooting at?
Nice shooting!About 45-50 ft rapid fire
Nice shooting!
What is the dynamic to cause guns to pull to the left in rapid fire? I have the same thing happen.
But why the left?Harder not to jerk the trigger at high rates of fire. Or mispositioned hand.
All you have to remember is that real men use assult rifles
But why the left?
I'm Right handed and there are only two factors that I can think of which are different left/right.
1. Shell Ejection, though I'm skeptical about this being sufficient.
2. You hand...Palm on one side, finger and thumb on the other. Is it that the recoil is better handled by the palm than the fingers?