QuaiChangKane said:
Sure he can reinstate. But he doesn't have full discretion - there are mandatory minimums he has to follow based on what you're convicted of. And regardless of what he decides is just punishment for your offense, he can't overrule the DMV.
Manditory minimum sentences are an entirely different animal. Obviously they remove discretion on sentencing.
According to the DMV website, the judge appears to act like a referral. He decides if you can get a restricted license, and then upon completion of certain steps (DUI school, reissue fee, proof of financial responsibility) the DMV grants the license.
your contention that the judge cannot overrule the DMV appears erroneous. they work together but with separate roles.
It may not cost any more monthly for your SR-22, but it will cost you a filing fee if you decide to change insurance companies. It's also a violation of your license restrictions if you should forget to do so when you change insurance companies, and can result in a license suspension. And you're welcome.
thanks for telling me alot of simple, common sense stuff I already know. Honestly, this info has nothing to do with our discussion, it almost looks like you are just bullshitting around in some strange attempt to prove that you know what you are talking about.
Yes, this is true -while you're on probation for a DUI. The fact that you're so drunk that you can't decide whether or not it's safe for you to get behind the wheel with someone else that's been drinking is simply further evidence that you have a problem with alcohol - and that you haven't changed any of the habits that most likely caused you to recieve a DUI in the first place.
Look, you have no factual advantage here unless you can point to a specific case or a Penal Code that validates your statement.
It may well indicate that you have a drinking problem if you and your buddy are driving around, completely sloshed at 3 AM.
Nevertheless, such a charge would be nearly impossible to convict someone on (IMO).
Well that makes it all better then, doesn't it?
way to respond to my comment like a smartass.
The point of me saying that I didn't go to court for the DUI was a concession on my lack of knowledge surrounding a DMV specific hearing (vs standard criminal court).
Damn. You found me out. Guess I'm not part of the "in" crowd anymore, eh? BRB - I'm gonna go knock over a liquor store.... [/B]
Don't be ridiculous. The simple fact is your're clueless about how negotiations between defense lawyers, DAs, and judges really work. But hey, if acting all juvenile about it makes you feel better, go for it.