NolaNomad
Missing Benders
After a careless and slightly tipsy co-worker backed over my '03 Triumph Speed Four a few weeks ago......
I am now looking at a possible "total" on the S4. Boo.
I am thinking I will take this "opportunity" to upgrade a bit and have the SD & S3 in the cross -hairs.
SD: '07-'08 75deg. 990 cc V-Twin Motard based streetfighter from KTM.
It was remarkable how agile and balanced it was. It felt good in traffic, splitting. Top notch components, a bit touchy fueling but showed well in handling, very well.
slightly used with 1 year warranty.
$$$$.$$
S3: '07-'08 1050 cc inline triple classic streetfighter from Triumph. I have not tested this bike. Reported the power plant in one of the best on the road now, and is hard to beat. Very hard.
Useable powerband, better top end. Durable
Used no warranty
$$$$.$$
Me: Daily commuter, in and around SF, rain or shine. Practice skills on twisty stuff when I can, more is better. Looking ahead for track day or two, agin to build skill and general awesome fun.
I like the looks of both, coming from a S4, I like what I see in Triumph
but I was surprised at the KTM build quality, engine pedigree and overall feel of the rig. Very differant ergos will take some getting used to coming from more lean forward low grips. But kinda nice being up highover traffic
Let me pick your community brain and ask:
"Knowing what you know now, what bike would you have chosen and why"?
So if you can speak from experience on either the SD or S3.
Please tell me your story..........
I am now looking at a possible "total" on the S4. Boo.
I am thinking I will take this "opportunity" to upgrade a bit and have the SD & S3 in the cross -hairs.
SD: '07-'08 75deg. 990 cc V-Twin Motard based streetfighter from KTM.
It was remarkable how agile and balanced it was. It felt good in traffic, splitting. Top notch components, a bit touchy fueling but showed well in handling, very well.
slightly used with 1 year warranty.
$$$$.$$
S3: '07-'08 1050 cc inline triple classic streetfighter from Triumph. I have not tested this bike. Reported the power plant in one of the best on the road now, and is hard to beat. Very hard.
Useable powerband, better top end. Durable
Used no warranty
$$$$.$$
Me: Daily commuter, in and around SF, rain or shine. Practice skills on twisty stuff when I can, more is better. Looking ahead for track day or two, agin to build skill and general awesome fun.
I like the looks of both, coming from a S4, I like what I see in Triumph
but I was surprised at the KTM build quality, engine pedigree and overall feel of the rig. Very differant ergos will take some getting used to coming from more lean forward low grips. But kinda nice being up highover traffic
Let me pick your community brain and ask:
"Knowing what you know now, what bike would you have chosen and why"?
So if you can speak from experience on either the SD or S3.
Please tell me your story..........
Last edited:

Mark 