Digital SLR / DSLR Camera Question / DSLR Thread 2

[Cycle61]

I'm going to have do agree to disagree with you here, at least voicing from the Canon camp. When you're at the very end of your exposure limit, 2/3 of a stop counts for quite a lot. The 50mm f/1.4 is built a lot more robustly and will likely outlast three or four fantastic plastics, which is enough to justify the price, provided that its a lens you use a lot, which I do. More accurate AF, better optics, and much, much nicer bokeh are all icing on the cake.

Sure, if its not a lens you use much, stick with the cheap one. But is the higher price tag of the f/1.4 worth it? abso-fuckin-lutely.

Just don't get me started on the 50mm f/1.2. Too rich for my blood.

Actually, I'm lying a little bit about the above picture. It's not taken with a Nikon lens at all, but rather with a Pentax Takumar 50/1.4 on an M42 to Nikon adapter. (PS, canon can't do this ) The lens is literally the size of a walnut, and had a beautiful rich brown coloring to the glass that I'm told was doped with thorium or something back in the fifties when it was made. It's like a permanent warming filter on the lens, and it costs me about 3/4 stop of light compared to clear glass.

And my shutter speed was something like 1/2 second. I can hold dead still when I've got something to brace on (a camp chair, in this picture.)

 

[TylerW]

It's not taken with a Nikon lens at all, but rather with a Pentax Takumar 50/1.4 on an M42 to Nikon adapter. (PS, canon can't do this )

Really? I'll have to tell my coworker that he needs to stop shooting with his Pentacon 50mm f/4 adapted to his 5d via an adapter with tilt-shift functionality, since you said it can't be done.

 

[wannabe]

Really? I'll have to tell my coworker that he needs to stop shooting with his Pentacon 50mm f/4 adapted to his 5d via an adapter with tilt-shift functionality, since you said it can't be done.

Maybe he's saying that the Nikon adapter won't work on the canon.

 

[m_asim]

Exactly. I was wondering if someone would comment on that.
The photos were taken in the 1970s with, of course, 70s technology. I wondered to myself how much better (or worse) the technology is today for a given price range, or how many of the technological advancements of today really apply to me.

Apples and Oranges, my friend.

Those pictures were taken on B&W film which produces highly detailed pictures. Anyone remember the awesomness of Tri-X
The camera you are looking to buy is a DSLR that takes images on via its CMOS sensor.

However many of these pictures must have been taken using very good optics. Optics make a big difference.

 

[Cycle61]

Really? I'll have to tell my coworker that he needs to stop shooting with his Pentacon 50mm f/4 adapted to his 5d via an adapter with tilt-shift functionality, since you said it can't be done.

Oh. Oops, nevermind. Is it the old Canon lenses you guys can't use? Ancient glass on digital bodies ftw!

 

[TylerW]

We can't use the old FD mount glass on modern bodies, at least not without adapters, but I think there are adapters that will let you mound just about anything to anything, provided the cash and the patience to work will fully manual focusing, aperture and metering.

 

[Baptistro]

Shit, I'm still confused. I'd like to go DSLR for similar reasons to Faz, new baby, want to record the memories. I don't like the look of flash photos on point and shoots, and would like to capture more natural looking pics. What's the best bang for the buck, and what lenses will I need at a minimum?

 

[faz]

Shit, I'm still confused. I'd like to go DSLR for similar reasons to Faz, new baby, want to record the memories. I don't like the look of flash photos on point and shoots, and would like to capture more natural looking pics. What's the best bang for the buck, and what lenses will I need at a minimum?

John, first, do NOT delay the purchase... buy a SLR as soon as possible. SERIOUSLY. The longer you wait, the more disappointed you will be with yourself for missing the opportunity.

(And frankly, you can't go wrong with a Canon.)

 

[VeloceMoto]

Apples and Oranges, my friend.

Those pictures were taken on B&W film which produces highly detailed pictures. Anyone remember the awesomness of Tri-X
The camera you are looking to buy is a DSLR that takes images on via its CMOS sensor.

However many of these pictures must have been taken using very good optics. Optics make a big difference.

Really? Because I was going to say the photos don't look nearly as sharp or detailed as some photos I have seen from a d40 with a $600 lens. What gives. But then, I am a noob.

 

[TylerW]

John, first, do NOT delay the purchase... buy a SLR as soon as possible. SERIOUSLY. The longer you wait, the more disappointed you will be with yourself for missing the opportunity.

(And frankly, you can't go wrong with a Canon.)

And if you do go with Canon, this lens will get you the results you are looking for:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/con...sp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=submit

 

[Baptistro]

what canon body do you guys recommend? And am I better off buying the kit with the 18-55 mm lens and adding the 50 mm lens, or just getting the body and the 50mm?

 

[wannabe]

what canon body do you guys recommend? And am I better off buying the kit with the 18-55 mm lens and adding the 50 mm lens, or just getting the body and the 50mm?

Just go to Costco and buy whatever kit they have on sale there. I believe that they have the Xsi on sale with the 18-55 lens. You can always buy the 50mm lens later.

Like Faz says, just suck it up and go get it today. You will not regret it. Every day that you wait trying to figure out the 'best' camera to get is just another day that you miss out on great shots of the munchkin doing stuff.

I have a Canon Xti with a bunch of lenses. I am one of the people that thinks that you can't go wrong either way with a Canon or Nikon. You can always upgrade later, but you can't go back and take pics of stuff that happened before you got the camera.

edit: By the way, this is the highlight of my portfolio right now.

 

[1sicv8]

i have an XT and it does a fine job, if ur not super serious about the hobby id go with that or a XTi. used they can be had for 300-400. if u wanna get serious and have a great starting point get a 40d canon or if u wanna save a lil a xsi.

thats just my opinion though

i never had a kit lens but i did buy the 50mm right away and love it.

 

[TylerW]

John, for shooting kids, if you have the money to drop on it I'd highly recommend one of the #0D bodies. (50D, 40D they're robust enough that you can even buy used ones with confidence) They're built more sturdily, and the Auto Focus is a lot faster than the digital rebel bodies. Kids move pretty quick, especially once they begin walking.

I was having a bit of trouble nailing the focus on my step-neice pictured above with my 40D. I think a digital rebel would be lost, but then, the last one I used was a Rebel XT. They may have gotten better.

 

[faz]

You can always upgrade later, but you can't go back and take pics of stuff that happened before you got the camera.

+1

Here is a point and shoot picture of my daughter, with a low quality 75-200 lens that I bought used for about $120 or so.

No touch ups or anything afterwards, other than a crop to 8x10 size. Taken at about 8 am in our patio, the dark background is the bar-b-que cover.

 

[Baptistro]

Figure I want to spend no more than 1k for the entire kit.

Which is the better value?

A fully kitted Nikon D40 and save 30% ($700 for the body and three lenses, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR Lens, 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR Lens, Normal AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D Autofocus Lens)?

Or a fully kitted Nikon D60 (around 1k for the body and three lenses, # 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX VR Zoom NIKKOR Lens, # 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED AF-S DX Zoom NIKKOR Lens, Normal AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D Autofocus Lens)?

Or a fully kitted Canon XSi (around 1k for the body and three lenses, Canon EF-S 18-55mm IS Lens, Canon EF 75-300mm Lens, Normal EF 50mm f/1.8 II Autofocus Lens)?

 

[faz]

Bap,
one thing I like about the Canon is that it puts all of the info on the LCD screen itself (see pic below), so you can view the settings right there, instead of looking at the small top side window. Costco's deal looks good to me... actually, if someone would buy my XTi body/kit lens/orig accessories for $500, I would buy the XSi or a 40D from Costco myself.


(picture from costco)

 

[BrassPremier]

Pretty sure the nikon d40 only shows its info through the lcd, no top screen

 

[Baptistro]

I pulled the trigger on the XSi, with all three lenses, the 2GB SD card, a soft lens case, and a GB2400 camera bag for a whopping total of $1,031.84, including tax and shipping.

 

[faz]

I pulled the trigger on the XSi, with all three lenses, the 2GB SD card, a soft lens case, and a GB2400 camera bag for a whopping total of $1,031.84, including tax and shipping.