NorCalBusa
Member #294
^^- edit: I don't know why it didn't post the url
"It would also prohibit law enforcement agencies from purchasing the items and require agencies to update their use-of-force policies to reflect the ban.
In a Senate Public Safety Committee hearing Wednesday, Sharp-Collins said that the gloves are not currently in use in California by law enforcement, but said legislation banning them was necessary to prevent possible harm.
“Imagine your family, your friends and loved ones, or even yourself, being incapacitated by federal, state or local law enforcement who do not have the necessary training to ensure that you don’t suffer from adverse health effects due to being shocked,” Sharp-Collins said in the hearing, arguing the gloves have not gone through adequate health and safety review for law enforcement use. "
If the tool is banned, why would you need a Use of Force Policy?
To prevent harm- maybe the bad guys/gals should consider that before they break the law and resist arrest.
That don't have training- no way in hell such an item would get deployed without training.
From where does the flowery "not gone through adequate training" come?
Nor does it define "adequate training".
We pay these people to write Bills, this is as good as they do so?
California lawmakers scramble last-minute bill to block ICE use of electric shock gloves
I don't get it."It would also prohibit law enforcement agencies from purchasing the items and require agencies to update their use-of-force policies to reflect the ban.
In a Senate Public Safety Committee hearing Wednesday, Sharp-Collins said that the gloves are not currently in use in California by law enforcement, but said legislation banning them was necessary to prevent possible harm.
“Imagine your family, your friends and loved ones, or even yourself, being incapacitated by federal, state or local law enforcement who do not have the necessary training to ensure that you don’t suffer from adverse health effects due to being shocked,” Sharp-Collins said in the hearing, arguing the gloves have not gone through adequate health and safety review for law enforcement use. "
If the tool is banned, why would you need a Use of Force Policy?
To prevent harm- maybe the bad guys/gals should consider that before they break the law and resist arrest.
That don't have training- no way in hell such an item would get deployed without training.
From where does the flowery "not gone through adequate training" come?
Nor does it define "adequate training".
We pay these people to write Bills, this is as good as they do so?