A cager backed into and totalled my bike last October. I had to take her insurance company (Mercury Insurance) to court to sue for the proper amount of restitution, as they tried sticking it to me with a severe lowball settlement.
I don't follow why you're grateful that she had insurance (I take it you didn't have collision/comprehensive insurance on your ride).
After all, you could've taken her to court for damages, right? Insurance or no. Hell, AFAIK you can be taken to court for civil damages even if you do have insurance... and for more than they will cover.
---
My own observations on (auto) insurance:
1. Mandatory insurance requirements can only drive the price up, when normally prices should go down as customers increase in a market (economies of scale). Why? Because we HAVE TO HAVE IT... and they know it
2. Uninsured motorist is a beautiful money maker-- just like "insurance" against a 21 in blackjack. The premium is charged for what is usually a hit and run situation. Almost like free cash in the hand...
3. In this weird day of hyper PC egalitarianism, the auto insurance industry is one of the few places where sexism and other forms of discrimination are allowed because of statistical analysis. Perhaps they need to be more honest and start applying this to all facets of life-- age (shoot, already do that!), sex (ditto), race (not officially, but why not?)...
"Ok, here is your value meal, but since you are Male, and of Latino descent, we will have to charge you a Robbery Insurance fee..."
4. Although I actually agree with the use of statistical analysis (with all the good and bad), what I dispise insurance companies for is playing both sides of the coin: first they charge you for expected rate of all similar drivers, then they charge you MORE on an individual basis.
Wait... how can they charge me up front for the statistical average, and then RAISE my rate for making a claim? When I throw down my $2600 a year for my R1, I'm already paying for the sins of all my other idiot R1 riders
So by what justification do they raise rates? Their upfront premium is saying "this is how much we need from each GYCSZBXFR-998RRRRR rider to make a profit, according to our statistical records and predictions."
Bah. Stereotype me, or treat me individually, not both!
5. Insurance companies will stoop to damned near any level to have a legally justifiable way to raise your rate, including but not limited to paying (hey! my premiums!) for police departments to have more/newer radar detectors. Nice little investment they make there
6. Legalism: They don't just care about fraud, but they will attempt everything possible to deny a claim through loopholes, or tack on additional fees whereever possible. They're damned near like banks it seems like...
Example: I have two auto policies, one for three bikes and one for a pickup truck. I pay four separate liability premiums for each. Both policies are "NAMED DRIVER" only... so they only cover liability for myself.
How the fuck do I ride two motorcycles at the same time?