• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Ninja ZX-25R

It'll be too expensive, IMO...

Exactly.

These bikes make more sense in the countries that have tiered licensing laws. New they'll only be marginally cheaper than a 600, so if you can get a 600 for the cost of a 250, most riders are going to go for the 600. In countries with the tiered licensing laws, you can't, so you get the 250.

I had the original CBR250RR in Sydney ... it was interesting to ride, revved (according to the tach) to 19500. Like riding a sewing machine, was a good laugh. But if it'd been my only bike, I would have sold it for a 600 to have something more livable day to day.
 
Exactly.

These bikes make more sense in the countries that have tiered licensing laws. New they'll only be marginally cheaper than a 600, so if you can get a 600 for the cost of a 250, most riders are going to go for the 600. In countries with the tiered licensing laws, you can't, so you get the 250.

I had the original CBR250RR in Sydney ... it was interesting to ride, revved (according to the tach) to 19500. Like riding a sewing machine, was a good laugh. But if it'd been my only bike, I would have sold it for a 600 to have something more livable day to day.

Exactly, especially considering how FLAT and BORING the majority of the US is. Here in the Bay Area a 250 can be used as a Mines Rd ripper, or crawl through shitty 25 MPH traffic, and the difference between a 600 and 250 is minimal. However in Kansas where everything is flat and boring as far as the horizon, a 250 makes little to no sense.
 
The difference between a 600 and 250 even on the street will be considerable. The largest problem with a 250 on the street is the danger in how they make time: faster corner speeds. I'd prefer slower the slower corner speed of a larger CC bike, IMO.
 
The difference between a 600 and 250 even on the street will be considerable. The largest problem with a 250 on the street is the danger in how they make time: faster corner speeds. I'd prefer slower the slower corner speed of a larger CC bike, IMO.

You like going slow in corners? :wtf

We're doomed.
 
Haha! That corner speed becomes a large problem when traction's lost!
 
It's designed for markets in SE Asia and perhaps elsewhere.

Huge markets, many countries with 250cc limits and a lot of upwardly mobile young people who want cool bikes...

this is a world bike, the US sportbike market is so tiny that I’m sure it didn’t even enter into the design discussions
 
It's way more fun to ride a small bike fast than a big bike slow, IMO.

I'd take it over a 600.
 
Agree victor with the fun factor. The danger factor is a bit more on the street, IMO...but given most riders on the street crash due to poor judgement, it probably makes little difference.
 
Meh, I would have preferred they did a ZX4R with these numbers:

100hp @ 18.5k RPMs (at the crank)
30ft/lb torque
330lbs (wet)
Fully adjustable suspension (front and back)
All rider aids (traction control, ABS, rider modes, etc..)
110/160 tires (front/rear)
 
Meh, I would have preferred they did a ZX4R with these numbers:

100hp @ 18.5k RPMs (at the crank)
30ft/lb torque
330lbs (wet)
Fully adjustable suspension (front and back)
All rider aids (traction control, ABS, rider modes, etc..)
110/160 tires (front/rear)

Lol so you just want a zx6r that weighs 100 pounds less.
 
Meh, I would have preferred they did a ZX4R with these numbers:

100hp @ 18.5k RPMs (at the crank)
30ft/lb torque
330lbs (wet)
Fully adjustable suspension (front and back)
All rider aids (traction control, ABS, rider modes, etc..)
110/160 tires (front/rear)

You forgot to mention full engine teardown and rebuild every other race weekend or every thousand street miles...

FYI, mid 80's or low 90's hp numbers were possible even 20-25 years ago with heavily modified and built Honda and Yamaha 400's, only catch was that the motor was a grenade with the pin pulled and none of them could make even half a season, sometimes not even one weekend.

As far as the 250 screamers, I could see them catching on with both street riders and racers, as long as they're equipped with really modern components and electronics. The Ninja 250/300/400 or whatever they sell now is still very popular for commuting, trackdays and racing, but I consider it kind of a 'budget bike' with fairly antiquated parts and technology. Most newer riders have no business on a liter bike or even a 600 sportbike, they're in way over their head, like handing the keys to a 911 to a teenage driver. Seen the movie, know how it ends...
 
Meh, I would have preferred they did a ZX4R with these numbers:

100hp @ 18.5k RPMs (at the crank)
30ft/lb torque
330lbs (wet)
Fully adjustable suspension (front and back)
All rider aids (traction control, ABS, rider modes, etc..)
110/160 tires (front/rear)

Jeff, you pretty much already can own that bike: 17' R6 w/ power/ weight about the same.
 
Jeff, you pretty much already can own that bike: 17' R6 w/ power/ weight about the same.

Not quite, that’s about 89lbs extra weight on that R6. I’m more concerned about shaving off the weight than maintaining power to weight.
 
Not quite, that’s about 89lbs extra weight on that R6. I’m more concerned about shaving off the weight than maintaining power to weight.

Gotcha Jeff.
 
Here is the closest you'll get to ride one
[YOUTUBE]m_GkGlGn10o[/YOUTUBE]

I would love to ride one though.
 
Last edited:
Every newbie I've talked with recently wants a 1000cc bike, so I'm a little skeptical that anyone will care about 250s...

Really ? They may talk about them, but the smart ones are terrified of them. There's plenty of smarter riders who know the excitement of riding a small bore machine.

Mad
 
Back
Top