FreeRyde
The Curmudgeon
There is a major problem with direct mount (single pivot) bikes. They are the least sensitive design when on the brakes. The braking force(s) creates more suspension squat than a well designed linkaged bike. This is scientific fact. While the differences are not huge, there is a difference, and if you are tuned into suspension on a high level, you can feel it. That is part of the reason why almost all winning mountain bike designs are NOT single pivots...
Bump sensitivity is reduced as the rear suspension squats due to braking force. (Direct mount is plagued by this)
Few argue that this "squat" can help limit weight transfer to the front, those folks are far and few between. But the reduction in bump sensitivity (traction) in the rear end outweighs the pros...
I agree that all suspension designs are a compromise on a fundamental level, but direct mount is the bottom of the barrel (think Natural Ice) as far as technological advances go in the suspension world.
Bump sensitivity is reduced as the rear suspension squats due to braking force. (Direct mount is plagued by this)
Few argue that this "squat" can help limit weight transfer to the front, those folks are far and few between. But the reduction in bump sensitivity (traction) in the rear end outweighs the pros...
I agree that all suspension designs are a compromise on a fundamental level, but direct mount is the bottom of the barrel (think Natural Ice) as far as technological advances go in the suspension world.
