I just want a descent electrical car with 200+ mile range in 25-35k range.
Tesla Model 3.
220 mile range.
$35K before incentives.
Tesla Model 3.
220 mile range.
$35K before incentives.
You are getting base model at the upper most range. I guess I should have said base model starts below 30k. At 30+k range should at least be bumped to 300.
People read so much FUD about "TESLA WILL NEVER RELEASE THE $35,000 MODEL 3" that people have accepted the FUD as fact.
How much do you drive that you need to 300 miles of range anyways?
My Model S has 260 miles of range, but I seldom charge it above 60-70%.
I don't think most people understand how pointless paying for that extra range is.
As I said my personal price point is base model under 30k, not the top most range.
I am not most people. I do enough 100+ one way trips through out a year and I don't really want to search for charging station at the destination to drive back that ideally I would prefer 300 mile range. Specially if I am forking over 35k. Again this is my price point and requirement.
Other auto makers and DC fast charge networks have had issues working together. ChargeGate some call it. Nissan Leaf owners thought their car was going to charge fast, but on the second fast charge, they were not charging at the peak rate.
I just want a descent electrical car with 200+ mile range in 25-35k range.
You really shouldn't just single out Nissan here. What about Tesla's batterygate?
Tesla capped the battery capacity of many older cars with the 85kwh batteries and also crippled their charging rates.
Presumably, this is to prevent fires but nobody got a straight answer from Tesla because Tesla is a piece of shit company when it comes to customer service.
I believe there is litigation ongoing now to resolve this issue.
I would just avoid the gen 1 car of any manufacturer. Prone to have issues and Tesla is no exception.
I don't think most people understand how pointless paying for that extra range is.
How many people need lifted dually brodozers?
Cool truck.
It’s not a shortcoming, I just got out of the pool.
If Fiskers SUV thing comes true, the base model, after incentives, will be about 30k. A lot of the cars get to a place where after incentives they are at 30k or so, as long as the incentives hold out.
Though, I certainly would like to see the price difference between EV and ICE start to equalize.
Personally, I want to see a small, EV sporty car competing with the Toyota GT86, Civic Type R, Veloster N, Miata, with that same 200+ range and priced where they are, 30-40k.

Cool truck.
It’s not a shortcoming, I just got out of the pool.
I forgot about your specific requirements and I was going to suggest the used market (always a advantage), but I just checked Autotrader and the used market is really thin and expensive for Model 3. It looks like owners like hanging on to their cars.
Right now if you want to do a road trip in a EV and fast charge - Tesla is the only good option.
Other auto makers and DC fast charge networks have had issues working together. ChargeGate some call it. Nissan Leaf owners thought their car was going to charge fast, but on the second fast charge, they were not charging at the peak rate.
When VW auto group committed the diesel emission scandal - the largest automotive scandal in history- they were ordered in the US to start up "Electrify America" charge network with fast chargers that were as good as better as Tesla Superchargers (~250 kW). Yet, there is a antidote of Audi owners begging to have a Tesla because basically Electrify America charge network does not work. It does sound like EA will improve , but they have to stand on their own with no more startup money from VW.
If Fiskers SUV thing comes true, the base model, after incentives, will be about 30k. A lot of the cars get to a place where after incentives they are at 30k or so, as long as the incentives hold out.
Tesla Model 3.
220 mile range.
$35K before incentives.