• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Why I refuse to vote for Barak Obama

I've wasted my vote since 1980. Get on the fail boat and vote GREEEEEEEEN!!! (or some other 3rd party loser, whatever)

well yeah and the beauty is in california you are not really wasting your vote. for instance i voted for nader and not gore vs. bush. i don't feel i thrw my vote away as california did not support bush anyway.
 
I'd vote for an exteme leftist, but there has never been one running for president in this country ever.

This elections seems to be a choice between having abortions or having guns and really nothing else.
 
Umm...What if nobody is close to my political views?


Is there a Pro-Apocalyptic party?

Pencil in Cthulhu for president and FTW. :laughing:thumbup
 

Attachments

  • cthulhu-2012.jpg
    cthulhu-2012.jpg
    64.1 KB · Views: 29
Of the three points the author states, none would be deal breakers for me, and I'd also say they're overblown.

I disagree with the drone war but to say all the stress in the region is our doing ignores the circumstances and ignorantly implies people would otherwise feel safe and secure.

Arguing the citizenship rights of Anwar alawaki represents a danger to us all is simly rediculously IMO

We had minor involvement in Libya congruent with past executive branch actions and NOTHING near what was done during the Bush Admin

That said, I didn't vote for Obama last election and I doubt he'll get my vote this time.
 
I hear this said so much, but I can't help but wonder which is actually the "wasted" vote:

A) The one where you vote for who you actually want to win the election, even if that person doesn't win
B) The one where you vote for "the lesser of 2 evils" even though you know they both suck, instead of voting for who you actually want to win

In 1996, the presidency of the USA was decided by just 49.1% of the citizens who could have voted. ( http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html)
The percentages for the midterm elections, where the members of congress (in my opinion, the real source of the BS) are worse! The leaders of our country are chosen by about 1/3 the populace.

So seriously... think of the true voting power of the apathetic. It's sad really. How could a government "of the people" work when 2/3rd's of it's people never speak?

The most important thing you could do, is help people understand that. And then vote for someone YOU would want to represent YOU.
 
I will not misspell the name of the President of the United States
I will not misspell the name of the President of the United States
I will not misspell the name of the President of the United States
I will not misspell the name of the President of the United States
I will not misspell the name of the President of the United States

:laughing

:thumbup :laughing

Maybe that's why my write in votes never win, I've misspelled them all. :teeth
 
In 1996, the presidency of the USA was decided by just 49.1% of the citizens who could have voted. ( http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html)
The percentages for the midterm elections, where the members of congress (in my opinion, the real source of the BS) are worse! The leaders of our country are chosen by about 1/3 the populace.

So seriously... think of the true voting power of the apathetic. It's sad really. How could a government "of the people" work when 2/3rd's of it's people never speak?

The most important thing you could do, is help people understand that. And then vote for someone YOU would want to represent YOU.

Yes to this.
 
We should use 'instant run-off' voting.
You vote for your first choice (say Green) and also your second choice (R/D)
In the event your first choice loses, your second choice receives your vote.
Third parties get their electorate's true vote without voters risking a 'wasted vote' only to watch their preferred mainstream candidate lose by a hair.
What's the downside?
 
:laughing Well, yeah, there's that.
If it's any consolation, I heard him say that shortly after he was elected Governor of Minnesota, before he'd decided to head South of the border.

Of the three points the author states, none would be deal breakers for me, and I'd also say they're overblown.

Agreed. After reading the article twice, I decided it wasn't good enough to share to counteract all my Obamabot and Romneytard friends on fb.
 
Having a choice between two shit sandwiches (and knowing you'll be eating one of them, yes one of these two WILL absolutely be Pres.) means I'll be picking the one that tastes better. Mitt is worse.

My father used to say "Life is like a shit sandwich - the more bread you got the less shit you have to eat".

Does that mean you eat the shit sandwich with the most bread? :laughing
 
Obama is a solid central rightist and also a pretty good politician.

The latter is definitely true and the only reason he's sitting in the White House. The former is definitely not true unless you consider policies he inherited and had little choice but to continue for political expedience being a centrist and a righty. At his core, Obama and his policies are very left of center.

I'm an independent who has voted Democrat probably 85 percent of the time and Republican 15 percent of the time. The only things I'm conservative on are crime and punishment and personal fiscal responsibility. Very liberal on other things and very centrist in terms of seeing both sides of the argument. The biggest thing I notice about politics these days is that, while the right knows they're right of center, the left is delusional and thinks they're in the center, rather than on the left where they really are. IMO bias in the mainstream press is the reason for this, rather than the reality of the views of our populace. The right had this warped perspective for a long time in the 80s. Now the left is having their turn.

Obama is a decent guy, but the only reason he's sitting in the White House is because the Republicans have lost their way and the Dems have learned well how to run a campaign and control the message. I split my vote last time by not voting, because I didn't think either candidate deserved to be our President. I'm in a similar situation this time, though i think Mitt and Ryan is a somewhat better ticket than the train wreck that was McCain/Palin and, IMO, the only thing we should be worried about for the next 10 years is getting this economy back on track. And that's not something I think the Democratic policies are going to lead to in any meaningful way.
 
Last edited:
We should use 'instant run-off' voting.
You vote for your first choice (say Green) and also your second choice (R/D)
In the event your first choice loses, your second choice receives your vote.
Third parties get their electorate's true vote without voters risking a 'wasted vote' only to watch their preferred mainstream candidate lose by a hair.
What's the downside?

quan.jan5.jpg
 
I didn't vote for him in '08. He voted to renew the PATRIOT act. :thumbdown

Most of the Patriot Act was and is permanent law. The part that requires extension concerns roving wiretaps and searching records. It was voted for 72-23 in the Senate and 250-153 in the House. I'm pretty sure a Republican President would also have approved it.

Reference.

Personally I would rather have seen Obama veto it, but as a politician he chose to go along with the will of Congress and with the majority of the American people.

The only way you're gonna fix that is by changing public opinion. Throwing away your vote on a no-chance candidate is just dumb.
 
Rodr, I think Cootz was referring to Obama's vote as a senator. She couldn't have made her 2008 voting selection on an extension Obama signed as President.
 
Throwing away your vote on a no-chance candidate is just dumb.

That might be a bit true in a swing state, but here in the great state of California, where there is 0% chance of the Dems losing, vote your conscience.
 
Back
Top