• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Nation-wide climate strike by students

I appreciate it when members express their visceral reaction to something. I like honesty. What kind of forum would this be if everyone voiced a politically correct response. Borrrrring ...
 
Last edited:
Cause she's the only one saying it. Not another adult has theorize about climate change. It exists only in the mind of a 16 year old.
 
This thread is obscene. A whole group of supposed adults are upset because ADULTS question a CHILD'S perspective of climate change. So, you can't question a child's opinion because they are a child. You can't question a (fill in the blank) because they are a (blank). Just brilliant. Why don't we just stop having discussions at all, because what ever you spit out of your mouth is fine, and anyone questioning it is a (fill-in-the-blank-bad-person).

Re-tard-i-ness, Paper Tigers. :thumbdown Retarded.
Obscene?

What's obscene is the Adults attacking the messenger because they can't adequately address the message.

She and her fellow students have far more at stake than the attackers.
 
Obscene?

What's obscene is the Adults attacking the messenger because they can't adequately address the message.

She and her fellow students have far more at stake than the attackers.

fear based attacks?
kill the messenger style.
In a compassionate world she would be heard and appreciated.
 
The attacks on her have made news, but she has had a lot of receptive audiences too. If you haven’t seen her TEDx talk in Sweden, it’s worth a watch.

There is enormous inertia to overcome worldwide as humanity must make profound changes to stop making climate change worse. It’s understandable that people want to be 100% sure those steps are necessary. It’s also unlikely that we’ll be quite that sure.
 
Believe in climate change or not however those same human activities she's protesting against are also polluting the planet.
Are there people out there arguing that pollution isn't something to concern ourselves with.
 
Believe in climate change or not however those same human activities she's protesting against are also polluting the planet.
Are there people out there arguing that pollution isn't something to concern ourselves with.
The biggest driving force against climate change is for PROFIT. Since there is a lot of money involved, there is a lot of money to hire people (Politicians, news anchors, talk show hosts, etc.) to undermine the perception of it's necessity.
 
The biggest driving force against climate change is for PROFIT. Since there is a lot of money involved, there is a lot of money to hire people (Politicians, news anchors, talk show hosts, etc.) to undermine the perception of it's necessity.

I get whats behind it but there's more than one benefit to cleaning up our act. Yet the focus is always on climate change with its impact being further down the road. Therefore giving opponents their only wiggle room to argue against the theory and need for taking action.
 
There is enormous inertia to overcome worldwide as humanity must make profound changes to stop making climate change worse. It’s understandable that people want to be 100% sure those steps are necessary. It’s also unlikely that we’ll be quite that sure.

so this then, yes?

climate-change-a-timeline-climate-change-isnt-real-oops-fuck-59383150.png
 
This thread is obscene. A whole group of supposed adults are upset because ADULTS question a CHILD'S perspective of climate change. So, you can't question a child's opinion because they are a child. You can't question a (fill in the blank) because they are a (blank). Just brilliant. Why don't we just stop having discussions at all, because what ever you spit out of your mouth is fine, and anyone questioning it is a (fill-in-the-blank-bad-person).

Re-tard-i-ness, Paper Tigers. :thumbdown Retarded.

Wow you're not projecting at all, and your inductive reasoning is 100% flawless.

:laughing
 
This thread is obscene. A whole group of supposed adults are upset because ADULTS question a CHILD'S perspective of climate change. So, you can't question a child's opinion because they are a child. You can't question a (fill in the blank) because they are a (blank). Just brilliant. Why don't we just stop having discussions at all, because what ever you spit out of your mouth is fine, and anyone questioning it is a (fill-in-the-blank-bad-person).

Re-tard-i-ness, Paper Tigers. :thumbdown Retarded.

With all due respect, you and others are not questioning her perspective of climate change. You are questioning her BECAUSE SHE IS A CHILD. The fact that her opinion and statements may be valid is another thing altogether. If that's what you were arguing or questioning, fine. Go for it. But it's not. You are merely arguing BECAUSE SHE IS A CHILD.

Let's say for a second that you are an older man, just as an example. Why should I listen to anything you say? Clearly you are out of touch and probably close to senility. You should probably just be locked up in a convalescent home to spend your days yelling at clouds.

But that's not how it works. Your (hypothetically you) opinion is just as valid as an able-minded adult, which is just as valid as a 16-year-old's.

Argue the point buddy, not the validity of the person saying it.
 
This thread is obscene. A whole group of supposed adults are upset because ADULTS question a CHILD'S perspective of climate change. So, you can't question a child's opinion because they are a child. You can't question a (fill in the blank) because they are a (blank). Just brilliant. Why don't we just stop having discussions at all, because what ever you spit out of your mouth is fine, and anyone questioning it is a (fill-in-the-blank-bad-person).

Re-tard-i-ness, Paper Tigers. :thumbdown Retarded.

It's totally fair to question or even attack the message of any man, woman, or child. Especially if they sit at the tip of the spear of a major movement.

The message is, "listen to the science."

But the message isn't what's being assailed. It's the messenger, who is threatening and intimidating to many people because she's an effective leader, young, and a female.

The attacks say nothing about her or her message, but they reveal much about the attacker.
 
It's totally fair to question or even attack the message of any man, woman, or child. Especially if they sit at the tip of the spear of a major movement.

The message is, "listen to the science."

But the message isn't what's being assailed. It's the messenger, who is threatening and intimidating to many people because she's an effective leader, young, and a female.

The attacks say nothing about her or her message, but they reveal much about the attacker.

:applause
 
It's totally fair to question or even attack the message of any man, woman, or child. Especially if they sit at the tip of the spear of a major movement.

The message is, "listen to the science."

But the message isn't what's being assailed. It's the messenger, who is threatening and intimidating to many people because she's an effective leader, young, and a female.

The attacks say nothing about her or her message, but they reveal much about the attacker.


I love you
 
that idiot is probably a Morris dancer.

[youtube]pS4HDMSOwH4[/youtube]
 
Mass hysteria on display explains my take on the Strike. What doom and gloom are being taught to these Kids?
Their being exploited by adult activists. A form Child Abuse.
 
Back
Top