I got hit by a car a while back while lane splitting. Insurance said it was the car's fault. A few months later, my friend got hit by a car while lane splitting, police report had him at fault. So I'm just trying to gather some statistics here.
Ahh Santa, how about the statistics of what you were doing and what the car that hit you was doing?
What is anyone supposed to base fault on, when nothing is known?
In most cases when an accident happens during the act of lane splitting (right or wrong) the motorcycle is assigned the blame.
Weigh the odds and take your chances.
You were neither splitting nor sharing. Splitting implies riding between two lanes of traffic. You were either between the rightmost lane and the shoulder or the leftmost lane and the median. Thus, you lacked the protection of an adjacent lane keeping cars from entering your space.Monkey Pants wrote: I split to the front of a red right, and was hit by a car that turned into me (we were sharing lane) without signaling.
You were a victim of the “gap”, the most common lane-splitting crash, where a vehicle in one lane moves into a gap in the other lane, right in front of the motorcycle. Here are some other threads about gap crashes and close calls:santa wrote: I was splitting in #1 and the car switched from #2 to #1 and hit me.
Which is exactly why I always repeat what CHP commander told me: you split only when safe, and it's only safe when the cars you are passing are STOPPED, STOPPED, STOPPED because a stopped car in traffic CAN'T CHANGE LANES.I was splitting in #1 and the car switched from #2 to #1 and hit me.
Actually, any safety comes from stopped bumper to bumper traffic since that stops the cars from moving in their lanes. You are still vulnerable to somebody opening a door to empty an ashtray and you better be going slow enough to stop if they do.The relative safety of lane splitting comes from riding between two lanes of bumper-to-bumper traffic.
Ahh Santa, how about the statistics of what you were doing and what the car that hit you was doing?
What is anyone supposed to base fault on, when nothing is known?