California Assault Weapon Registration

[Snaggy]

By give I'm sure you meant that you went to your FFL and shipped the gun to his FFL as must be done with all interstate transfers...so you are AOK, right?

Hmmm, the son lived in CA until 2013 and was given the gun long before he took a job in Portland. He graduated from Sonoma State in fact. I believe the owner said it was a present for his 24th birthday.

 

[Junkie]

Hmmm, the son lived in CA until 2013 and was given the gun long before he took a job in Portland. He graduated from Sonoma State in fact. I believe the owner said it was a present for his 24th birthday.

If it was a RAW you couldn't legally transfer it to him if he was in California

 

[Snaggy]

If it was a RAW you couldn't legally transfer it to him if he was in California

I believe it was a RAW, so there's a problem then.

My friend used to have a pet rattlesnake. Snakes are escape artists and he used to worry whenever he was away from home. He said he felt like the snake owned him, not the other way around.

Reckon he feels the same way about this rifle.

 

[russ69]

No need to go to your FFL, you can ship it directly to an FFL (or hand it to one in person if you're out of state)

Thanks, I hate when I give the wrong info.

 

[russ69]

Hmmm, the son lived in CA until 2013 and was given the gun long before he took a job in Portland. He graduated from Sonoma State in fact. I believe the owner said it was a present for his 24th birthday.

I can't keep up with this stuff. There are so many rules and exceptions, I can't keep track of them all. As a general rule I never post about firearms transactions to stay on the safe side.

 

[msethhunter]

Just to show the problems with these new laws, I had a friend post on his Facebook yesterday that he was trying to sell a Ruger AR 15, fully "assaulty", and I told him he had to either sell it out of state, or make it compliant, and he had no idea.