metricHalfPint
more than a fifth
Traffic jams can happen on the track, and they can catch you off guard. But am I the only one who would find that for Group C riders, whose braking/swerving skills are likely not quite as refined as those of the riders in Group A and possibly B, that the following distances shown in the first two pictures below are way too close?
This is not to suggest that it's a frequent occurrence at trackdays, but having now seen these images, I'd feel much safer if minimum following distances were touched upon during riders meetings. Not coincidentally, the rider in the gray sweatshirt (in the third picture) demonstrating a safer following distance was actually a Group A rider only in C for demos. The C Group instructors at this track day also tended to allow more generous following distances than most other riders captured on camera, so wouldn't it make sense to follow their lead with regards to spacing? If you're riding with buddies or following an instructor in a long string of bikes, maybe you might agree on other norms amongst yourselves, but if not, the last picture might be a good example of how a group of several riders could safely space themselves in Group C.
I've ridden with several trackday providers and have had good experiences with all of them. This post was not intended to express disappointment with a situation at a particular track day, but rather to bring up a topic I don't recall being addressed at any of them. Maintaining safe passing distances usually gets brought up at the riders meetings, but I think many riders interpret it to mean side-to-side proximity. Wouldn't it be worth the extra few seconds to explicitly mention the safety bubble of at least a bike length also applies to following distances even at slower speeds in Group C? Riders might be more likely to maintain that distance even in a traffic jam if the issue is fresh in their minds.




(Mods: I put this in General, because especially during winter fewer riders may be following posts in the Trackdays Forum, and it may also be relevant for those who've not yet done track days but are considering it.)
This is not to suggest that it's a frequent occurrence at trackdays, but having now seen these images, I'd feel much safer if minimum following distances were touched upon during riders meetings. Not coincidentally, the rider in the gray sweatshirt (in the third picture) demonstrating a safer following distance was actually a Group A rider only in C for demos. The C Group instructors at this track day also tended to allow more generous following distances than most other riders captured on camera, so wouldn't it make sense to follow their lead with regards to spacing? If you're riding with buddies or following an instructor in a long string of bikes, maybe you might agree on other norms amongst yourselves, but if not, the last picture might be a good example of how a group of several riders could safely space themselves in Group C.
I've ridden with several trackday providers and have had good experiences with all of them. This post was not intended to express disappointment with a situation at a particular track day, but rather to bring up a topic I don't recall being addressed at any of them. Maintaining safe passing distances usually gets brought up at the riders meetings, but I think many riders interpret it to mean side-to-side proximity. Wouldn't it be worth the extra few seconds to explicitly mention the safety bubble of at least a bike length also applies to following distances even at slower speeds in Group C? Riders might be more likely to maintain that distance even in a traffic jam if the issue is fresh in their minds.




(Mods: I put this in General, because especially during winter fewer riders may be following posts in the Trackdays Forum, and it may also be relevant for those who've not yet done track days but are considering it.)
Last edited:




