• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Oroville dam spillway damaged

Necromancy!

This video just came up on the engineering report of the spillway failure. Good watch!

[YOUTUBE]jxNM4DGBRMU[/YOUTUBE]
 
I enjoyed it too I had wondered what actually was the failure mode and why and this video explained it really well.

I'd like to see a follow-up video on the repairs and how they went about fixing it so that this sort of thing doesn't happen again.

And I know it's probably far fetched to hope for but I wonder if they've taken those lessons and applied them to other spillways at other dams.
 
I enjoyed it too I had wondered what actually was the failure mode and why and this video explained it really well.

I'd like to see a follow-up video on the repairs and how they went about fixing it so that this sort of thing doesn't happen again.

And I know it's probably far fetched to hope for but I wonder if they've taken those lessons and applied them to other spillways at other dams.

I'd alsonlikentonsee a follow up. Grady makes good videos I've been watching them for a year or 3.

They fixed it by pouring large buckets of cash into the spillway. :laughing

The points he was explaining about ways to prevent such failures are certainly applied to any new structure and likely anything in the past 20 years (complete guess) The Oroville dam was started in 1961 and completed in 67. There are plenty of contemporary dams of similar construction that haven't been tested to this extreme, and have also not been updated to make them safe-r. The spillway at Lexington reservoir looks pretty similar to me, and it was built in the 50s.
 
We've learned a thing or two in the realm of engineering.

Here is an example that was played to one of my classes on my first day in engineering school. :laughing

[youtube]3mclp9QmCGs[/youtube]
 
Well, it's funny.

So, from a "Software Engineering" point of view, specifically data processing, we used to say you're not a professional until you've lost production data.

Nowadays, the ante is up to "you're not a professional until you've accidentally wracked up 1000s of dollars of cloud hosting fees".

Colleague discovered they had a process running on AWS costing $10K a day. They didn't discover it for a few weeks.

AWS is know to refund such...uh...adventures.
 
They fixed it by pouring large buckets of cash into the spillway. :laughing

$1.1 billion and it might require hundreds of millions more. :wtf

Also, there are still several dozen dams in the state that require similar retrofits.
 
$1.1 billion and it might require hundreds of millions more. :wtf

Also, there are still several dozen dams in the state that require similar retrofits.
That's what happens when officials kick the can down the road, costs to repair escalate.

There should be some people losing their pensions over this. IDK why public decision makers aren't held accountable when their actions or lack of cost the taxpayers $$$$$$ :x
 
Necromancy!

This video just came up on the engineering report of the spillway failure. Good watch!
Thanks for sharing. Worth watching and I learned quite a bit.

If someone discovers a follow-up video about rebuilding the spillway, please post it.

I've watched a lot of episodes of Engineering Disasters on History Channel. This one comes pretty close to making it into that series.
 
That's what happens when officials kick the can down the road, costs to repair escalate.

It wasn't clear to me that this was caused by a lack of repair and maintenance, but rather bad data upon which decisions were made (i.e. the quality of the underlying rock).
 
Back
Top