tzrider
Write Only User
Shoot to emasculate, then kill.
FTFY
Shoot to emasculate, then kill.
It should be legal to shoot these fuckers, when caught.
Up to 10 'suspicious' fires ignite in Bay Area overnight
Shoot to kill.
That’s a really cool picture from the Air Attack platform. It illustrates the difference in the surface winds and the winds aloft. Surprising to me that the fire didn’t spot more with that kind of wind.
I’m reading 400-ish acres and forward progress stopped on the Bridge Incident.
Good stop by the fire resources considering the majority of resources are committed to the Dixie and Caldor fires.
Makes me wonder what he was on probation for.Police arrested Ludwicki on suspicion of arson and violating his probation terms. Police said they found a lighter on Ludwicki, who admitted to intentionally lighting the fire.
Makes me wonder what he was on probation for.
Vandalism.
It's long been a contention of mine that most of these fires are arson, but the public eats up evil PG&E. When we publicize the hell out of dry conditions, wind, extreme fire danger, etc., it becomes a crazy arsonist's wet dream.
I don’t disagree that the publicity has got to be attractive to arsonists, but PG&E is responsible for many of the state’s big fires. The Dixie fire was started when a pine tree fell onto a line that was scheduled to be buried soon in an effort to reduce fire hazard. The cost to bury lines is astronomical. To be undertaking this, even PG&E is convinced their overhead lines are hazards.
Yeah but it just so happens that the most destructive fires were ignited by PG&E equipment.
Many? The percentage of proven or admitted PG&E fires is extremely small when compared to the volume of fires. Still, it's no excuse for the havoc their fires have wreaked.
In terms of square miles burned, property destroyed and lives lost, PG&E "wins" by a landslide.
Square miles? I don't think so. Property? Maybe. Lives? I already agree.
If you have stats to support that, I'd like to see it.
I should amend what I’ve said a bit. The comparison I’m making is PG&E vs. arson, as you’d said you think that “most of these fires are arson.” There are of course other causes, lightning being another one. Without researching more, I’d guess that most of our fires are lightning. Probably many fires are arson and it seems like the ones that get out of control, burn structures and kill people are PG&E.
EDIT: It looks like the majority of fires are considered “human caused,” which, unhelpfully, lumps power lines and other electrical fires in with arson.
Dixie appears to have been PG&E and the August complex was 38 lightning caused fires that merged. Those are the two largest in CA history. Arson fires would have a lot of catching up to do to be a contender.
Not minimizing arson. It sucks and I am another that feels a firebug should be shot on sight if caught in the act.
The Tubbs and Camp fires were both PG&E caused, no?