NSR250SP said:I did the best I could, and put down a 1:45 as a fast lap.
You sure that's not one of the infamous dbCom timing errors? The bikes that beat you were doing 1:52s.
Hmmm, why were you racing a Honda RS250 GP bike in 250 Superbike anyway?

NSR250SP said:I did the best I could, and put down a 1:45 as a fast lap.

afm956 said:You sure that's not one of the infamous dbCom timing errors? The bikes that beat you were doing 1:52s.
Hmmm, why were you racing a Honda RS250 GP bike in 250 Superbike anyway?![]()
ryanb said:Hey all,
Putting aside the COSTS of it, is having a 2nd racebike stupid?
NSR250SP said:no, as my on board timer confirmed the time... it was one lap, and that's the reason why I said I needed to string more of them together.
ryanb said:
A rolling 998 chassis you say? That's moto-crack! So bad and sooooo goooood! Talk to me! (as Jeff K. rolls his eyes and says, "Some people just cant take good advice....")
-Ryan

JnglstTICAL said:GoGo, I gave my puppy more love than I ever gave any girlfriend, and that damn puppy still did nothing but shit on my carpet and eat my shoes....

GoGo said:Ah.................. Maybe you shoulda tried a sheep instead?![]()


Enter, the Testastretta. Today's world is very different. Our first weekend at Infineon was on a totally stock 998 street motor. That thing ran.
The 999R is stock too, minus the clutch, wheels, and Home Depot chain guard[/B]
TWF said:thanks to competition not been serious about big twin/dont know how to build big twin.![]()
Manu ® said:I don't agree. I think the RC51 twin is just as good as the Ducati's. Matter of fact, for a Ducati to have similar performance with the RC, you need to spend almost twice as much.
Think about how many chicks the DUC will pull.....have you seen GoGo's :boobies 
Manu ® said:I don't agree. I think the RC51 twin is just as good as the Ducati's. Matter of fact, for a Ducati to have similar performance with the RC, you need to spend almost twice as much.
