• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

BARF Militia

Mr. Wonderful said:
Started the paperwork today on a uspc 357 and of course once we started they said it wasn't on the approved list and they wouldn't continue.
Wasn't happy to say the least...

God I love california and the gorgeous weather and riding but I swear the gun laws here are a pain in the a**
Click to expand...

Buy one in .40, buy .357 barrel online. Twoguns for not much more than the price of one. :thumbup
 
Mr. Wonderful said:
Started the paperwork today on a uspc 357 and of course once we started they said it wasn't on the approved list and they wouldn't continue.
Wasn't happy to say the least...

God I love california and the gorgeous weather and riding but I swear the gun laws here are a pain in the a**
Click to expand...

Was this a PPT? If done in person the list doesn't matter. Only if being shipped to the FFL and yes, that means in state too. People sell face to face non-roster handguns all the time. What FFL was it that said no?
 
Inkman said:
Blu......were ya out at USI today? Heard somebody asking about that particular gun at the pistol line.
Click to expand...


I was at the Santa Clara County Field Sports Park today, is that called USI? I was there shooting my k98 and my Type 99 on the rifle range and then my 45 and 40 on the pistol range. Were you the one shooting your wife's 357 revolver?
 
BLU_G.6K said:
I was at the Santa Clara County Field Sports Park today, is that called USI? I was there shooting my k98 and my Type 99 on the rifle range and then my 45 and 40 on the pistol range. Were you the one shooting your wife's 357 revolver?
Click to expand...

USI is in Concord behind the old Naval Weapons Station and before Bay Point.

http://www.unitedsportsmen.com/
 
I got this Lee Enfield Mk4 by Savage arms which was produced for the Lend Lease Program of WWII.

I don't really care much for it.

Maybe I should sell it to MikeT for 140 bucks??
 
^ That's a hell of a fair price. Is it a No 4 Mark 1 or No. 4 Mark 1*? Does it have the nonadjustable flip sights or the adjustable sight?
 
Inkman said:
Was this a PPT? If done in person the list doesn't matter. Only if being shipped to the FFL and yes, that means in state too. People sell face to face non-roster handguns all the time. What FFL was it that said no?
Click to expand...

Yeah I believe it was because it was shipped from out of state. They never did the drop test for that caliber for the uspc or some bullshit. It was with rogers relics, love the place just bummed it didn't work out.
 
BLU_G.6K said:
^ That's a hell of a fair price. Is it a No 4 Mark 1 or No. 4 Mark 1*? Does it have the nonadjustable flip sights or the adjustable sight?
Click to expand...

To be honest with you, I don't know.

It was fitted with a Scope Mount (no sights) and a monte carlo stock.

I asked people on Calguns and they said it qualifies for C&R.

Just looking to unload for cash.
 
No shit post pics, screw mike, I might have $140 cash for ya.
 
Dopesick said:
No shit post pics, screw mike, I might have $140 cash for ya.
Click to expand...

If you get it and want to know more about the Enfield send me a pm with the numbers from the gun and I'll look them up in a book I have for Enfield collectors.
 
Aside from the information I already sent you in pm's, from the pictures I can also tell from the flaming bomb proof mark that it was United States. The picture showing U.S. PROPERTY indicates the rifle was part of the Lend-Lease Act. Savage renegotiated its contract with the British government as a Lend-Lease agreement. A provision of the Lend-Lease Act, however, stipulated that war material "loaned" to the Allies ust be marked as property of the United States; so under the new contract, Savage added the U.S. Property to the angled flat on the upper left side of the action body. No more than a few hundred Savage rifles did not carry the "U.S. PROPERTY" marking.

I can also tell from the pictures that the Enfield has been sporterized because it does not have an original stock.

I pretty much typed word for word from the book "British Enfield Rifles, Volume 2" by Charles R. Stratton. :)
 
Last edited:
BLU_G.6K said:
Aside from the information I already sent you in pm's, from the pictures I can also tell from the flaming bomb proof mark that it was United States. The picture showing U.S. PROPERTY indicates the rifle was part of the Lend-Lease Act. Savage renegotiated its contract with the British government as a Lend-Lease agreement. A provision of the Lend-Lease Act, however, stipulated that war material "loaned" to the Allies ust be marked as property of the United States; so under the new contract, Savage added the U.S. Property to the angled flat on the upper left side of the action body. No more than a few hundred Savage rifles did not carry the "U.S. PROPERTY" marking.

I can also tell from the pictures that the Enfield has been sporterized because it does not have an original stock.

I pretty much typed word for word from the book "British Enfield Rifles, Volume 2" by Charles R. Stratton. :)
Click to expand...


Cool thanks for that wealth of info.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top