msethhunter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Location
- SoCal
- Moto(s)
- '98 VTR1000F, she's a fatty! '89 YSR 50 with a 150, she said "it's so cute!"
- Name
- Mikey
Only on BARF can a thread about treating people well turn into not treating people well
Only on BARF can there be so many different definitions of the same term.Only on BARF can a thread about treating people well turn into not treating people well

Sorry if the graphic detail was upsetting, but people were reacting to the 'rules' of chivalry back then, I was putting things in perspective on the absolute fact that it was a completely different time than now. The original 'rules' for chivalry are not applicable, that was then, this is now.
littlebeast apparently only condones talk of graphic violence if it's in relation to her children's hypothetical attackers.
Other cases can fuck straight the hell off.
Only on BARF can a thread about treating people well turn into not treating people well
FTFYOnly in the Kitchen Sink can a thread about treating people well turn into not treating people well

With my generation, opening doors for women was just a fact. Now, granted, a portion of the male population viewed women as the 'weaker' sex, not only in body strength, but that wasn't shared by all.
Clarly we grew up in different places.Absolutely, categorically untrue. I know we're about the same age and to pretend it was common 'when we were younger' is complete and utter bullshit.
And 'a portion of the male population viewed women as weak...' has been around forever.
The percentage may be slightly higher now, but please don't act like it was a standard practice for all high schoolers to hold doors for people in the eighties because it wasn't.
Or immediately after high school.
Or the years since.
Some people are considerate, and some are not.

As I said, we must have grown up in different areas.
Even when they spew bullshit?
With my generation, opening doors for women was just a fact.
Makes me laugh every time I read it.
Also, I didn't say you were full of bullshit. The claim you make is bullshit, however.

I have no doubt that was your intent, but it appears that reading comprehension (lack of) can be added to your sins.Pretty sure you just violated TOS, bruh.
Also please, please point out where I negated your experience by denying that "our generation" was truly chivalrous? By explaining that everyone most certainly did NOT act chivalrous is not at all negating your past. It's pointing out that your blanket statement is incorrect.

I have no doubt that was your intent, but it appears that reading comprehension (lack of) can be added to your sins.
As I stated, my experiences were obviously different from yours. Not sure where you grew up. You seem to think it was in the center of the universe.![]()

You stated : With my generation, opening doors for women was just a fact.
That is completely and incontrovertibly incorrect. Tell me what part I read incorrectly. Please.
The part where you speak for an entire generation of people from all walks of life?
The part where you said it was a fact?
Which part did I misread?
And again, you talk shit with a lie. Quote my statement where I act like my experience is the center of the universe...you can't because the entire time I've been showing that you simply cannot speak for 'your' generation.
And straight up resorting to name calling. Weak.![]()


