That's the same point I've been agreein9with since Cookie said he never thought about his apex ... early, late or 'ideal'.
Let's see if we can help him understand how different line choices will affect the bike in a turn.
Cookie, the notion of an apex comes into play when you are plotting a path of travel through a turn in which the line takes a wide entry, comes close to the inside edge of the lane somewhere in the middle of the turn and exits wide in the lane. Wherever you are closest to the inside edge of the turn is what we'd call your apex. Sometimes, your line might just follow the lane itself, in which case, you aren't really "apexing."
In either case, you want a line that allows good throttle control through the turn. There are other characteristics of a good line, but to focus on throttle control, a line that is constant or increasing radius as you progress through the turn will allow you to roll on slowly and smoothly through the corner. A line that gets tighter as you progress through the turn interferes with your ability to roll on the gas.
Given that, if you apex early in the turn, what would this do to your line later in the turn? If you apex later, say beyond the geometric midpoint, what would happen to this line's radius late in the turn? These choices directly impact your ability to use the throttle the way you want to.
Certain corners throw up exceptions. Mines Road famously has loose chip seal here and there and in some turns you're better off slowing down a little and following a clean tire track. A wide turn entry is usually a good way to improve your sight lines, but in some blind and narrow turns, a wide entry exposes you to more risk than the improved sightlines justify. In a small number of cases, you may be better off staying tighter to the inside edge of your lane to leave space and just slow down accordingly.
The above isn't crash analysis of course; it's an attempt to help you think through some of the information you're getting about apexes and where you choose to put them.