gixxerjoeca
New member
Frank for mod
And FREE VTRZA
And FREE VTRZA


.....On the other hand...how hard is it to follow the TOS ?
. Now you tell Human Ills to STFU and he will take it as baiting and in the context of Mr. Ills you would be in violation of the TOS. So a third person sees STFU's and in one instance a suspension is enforced an in the other a suspension is not. Thus there is ambiguity involved and not every "cheeseburger" is the same. So how hard is it to follow the TOS? Depends...... I responded. I don't count myself as among the people whose opinion matters, but I do think I've been an objective party and was following the deal as it was going down.
Thus there is ambiguity involved and not every "cheeseburger" is the same. So how hard is it to follow the TOS? Depends...
I'm offended that you're offended that someone else was offended...why do you always have to bash on me ?
(thanks George)
Your definition of objective and Webster or Merriams is different.
You wouldn't think it is hard, but in some instances it has nothing to do with intent and specifically to do with interpretation. The interpretation of the TOS is not evenly applied depending upon your perspective.
For instance you tell me to STFU and I don't take it personally for I have ridden with you, had dinner with you, drank a beer with you and consider you a friend. So to me a STFU from you always comes with a. Now you tell Human Ills to STFU and he will take it as baiting and in the context of Mr. Ills you would be in violation of the TOS. So a third person sees STFU's and in one instance a suspension is enforced an in the other a suspension is not. Thus there is ambiguity involved and not every "cheeseburger" is the same. So how hard is it to follow the TOS? Depends...
Yes, that is EXACTLY what I'm doing.
Edit: Seriously, I'm just trying to get to the source of your malfunction.
When did we start talking about you?
Why rehash all the same arguments just so a mod can drop by and invite someone to leave?

What's so bad about it?
Now we have Britny all to ourselves![]()
(this will get him back)![]()
Well played, my friend. 
What's so bad about it?
Now we have Britny all to ourselves![]()
(this will get him back)![]()
Trust me, he knows I can fend for myself.
Why rehash all the same arguments just so a mod can drop by and invite someone to leave?
So...you've been here what? Less than a year and yet you know the answers to everything? What's wrong with BARF? Why Bad Dad left? What Droopy thinks is lame? What Plane Gray means in his posts? and Frank? and George too? Really? Why not start your own forum?
What am I thinking while I'm posting this? Are you sure? You sure you don't want to "edit" that?
Like Holeshot said, Bad Dad chose to leave. He's still welcome in my pit, at my BBQ, on a ride with me anytime. I'll see him again. You...not so much.
Type less read more.
Lulz 4 Beau
Holy Cow ! you speak for me AND Droopy....you must be like Nostradamas or something ?
Lately I've noticed quite a few really early barfers posting up, ones I couldn't remember seeing before, less vocal members.
You directed the post at Corndog and me. I responded. I don't count myself as among the people whose opinion matters, but I do think I've been an objective party and was following the deal as it was going down.
Of course I'm not privy to behind the scene communications, nor would I want to be.
So...you've been here what? Less than a year and yet you know the answers to everything?

Type less read more.
Lulz 4 Beau
+1 Marco and I had our tussles on BARF, but he was a very likable guy when we finally met in person! I'd have a beer with him anytime.I don't give a shit if Marco is on BARF or not. He's still someone I'll welcome in my pit, anytime anyplace. BARF and the real world are many times, not one and the same. None the less, he did ask a request.