Climber
Well-known member
Good common sense reasoning, but common sense goes out the window when money can buy the way that those situations get handled.I think taxpayers shouldn't have to bear that burden either.
The only issue is, when it comes to some types of businesses, particularly in the financial realm, if they screw up and fail, like an industry wide thing we saw with the subprime loans being packaged in large investment pools, if they weren't bailed out, it would have likely tanked the economy into a depression and hurt the common man even more.
I like that reforms were also made, but our laws / regulators should have never allowed that to happen in the first place. And businesses need to be held accountable to the economy they thrive in, not just to shareholders. Laws need to be changed in that regard. We also probably need to require large financial corporations, and maybe other large fortune 500 type companies, to maybe pay into a rainy day fund of sorts, sufficient in size to be used to bail themselves out for the next time. Just a thought.
During the last financial crisis, they handled it Top Down instead of Bottom Up which would have been a fundamentally better approach, it would have been more complicated but that would have driven a job market and not rewarded the very people who created the problem, as happened.
