Reli
Well-known member
The 2 series is pretty interesting
Eh....IMO it looks stubby and wimpy compared to a proper 3 series.
Looks like a teenager or 20-something nerd car
The 2 series is pretty interesting
4 series > 3 or 2 series imo. Absolutely love the 435/440/M4.
Eh....IMO it looks stubby and wimpy compared to a proper 3 series.
Looks like a teenager or 20-something nerd car

4 series > 3 or 2 series imo. Absolutely love the 435/440/M4. For the sedans, 6-series gran coupe or M5. Not a huge fan of the 7 series.
Yeah yeah what everyone else said on maintenance.
But if you're a DIY type, and mechanically inclined, and have the space and tools to work on it...a 5 year old BMW is a labor of love. Or so I'm told. Never had one myself lol.
4 series > 3 or 2 series imo. Absolutely love the 435/440/M4. For the sedans, 6-series gran coupe or M5. Not a huge fan of the 7 series.
Yeah yeah what everyone else said on maintenance.
But if you're a DIY type, and mechanically inclined, and have the space and tools to work on it...a 5 year old BMW is a labor of love. Or so I'm told. Never had one myself lol.
An observation from the outside of 3's... the Start/Stop function really hi-lights a weird low RPM clatter (for lack of better term) from the motors. It kinda makes the gas engines sound enough like a diesel that I start looking for the D on the car.
What is that?
Yeah, can't imagine how they get the 4 cyls to sound like diesels. I had one on loaner and found the clatter and start/stop function irritating. Surely those starters will go out sooner.
Yeah, can't imagine how they get the 4 cyls to sound like diesels. I had one on loaner and found the clatter and start/stop function irritating. Surely those starters will go out sooner.

[1]I would take the Alfa Giulia or the C class over the 3 series
[2]the Audi A/S5 or C class coupe over the 4.
[3]With the BMW's, except for the very lightweight 2 series, they only really seem exciting close to the top of the range
)1. You're out your damn mind
2. You're out your damn mind
3. 'splain. Only exciting close to the top of the range how? Driven at the limit? More expensive options like M4 / M5 / M6 vs 435/440 and 550 / 650?
(annnnnnnd still out your damn mind)
Stan, I'd love an M4, but can't swing that anytime soon. The next big purchase I make is hopefully going to be a house, not another car. I do fucking love the M4s though. Sexy beast of a coupe.
Ok, I think that especially the 3 and 5 series are kind of boring in terms of styling, they aren't ugly, but they definitely aren't particularly attractive. When shopping for base models, I honestly think that exterior looks and interior goodies, and reliability matter more then nominal performance differences. To me, the Alfa wins on looks, the merc wins on interior stuff, and pick whichever Japanese brand you want for the best reliability. When you get into M cars, where performance is a key feature, they are much more appealing because they are always exceptionally well reviewed.
The first A4 (the B5) was a classic, but after that? Meh.....boring and uninspired IMOAudi's have always looked better than BMWs for like 12-18 years.
You know...places like Car and Driver review the Accord well. It's because it is sportier than the Camry. I think the Camry is a better car. If you're into performance then BMW M cars are great. If you want a luxury sedan...look elsewhere.
Personally if I ever got a BMW it would be a 750. Otherwise I'd prefer a LS460L. Both are uber expensive and impracticable unless you are toting people around for a profession.
![]()
Nice
![]()
Beige
![]()
Sweet
![]()
More Beige

I know right? Totally Alfa!!!