300hp out of 2.0 liters...durable enough that GM backed it with a 100k powertrain warranty. No wonder Fisker uses that engine in the Karma.

But I will say Toyota does have one standout that has good performance for what it was designed for. The FJ cruiser. Not too practical since it gets shit mileage, but damn. One of my service writers just got some special edition one that's solid red paint with black wheels and trim...that is a neat looking rig. Wouldn't mind having it myself.
Considering the Camaro is a sales flop...again...I'm not surprised.
Got one. It's a semi retro styling exercise generic computerized shit box seemingly with a hole in the gas tank. Doesn't do anything well but rides nice with the big tire diameters tho. Drive your writers and you'll see what I mean. Oh yeah, it has the nifty locking diff (way undersized) that I used once in 4 years to try it and is a weak spot that goes bang. Tell your writer to change the diff lube to some uber synthetic (IIRC ~6 quarts) in 10,000 miles.
*Put a switch in the blue/yellow wire by the master cyl to disable the nanny ABS and VSC and it is a bit better.
or honestly has never driven the damn thing.
Have you driven a C6 Vette?
I've driven a Mustang Laguna Seca at Thill.
Yes, the argument works both ways, but only one of us has personal experience. You're getting caught up in your own arguement(s). Re: brand loyalty, and actually driving the cars in question.

Cobalt SS was pretty potent. More importantly, it's Ecotec engine. 260hp right off the showroom floor. Another 40 with a dealer endorsed reflash. 300hp out of 2.0 liters...durable enough that GM backed it with a 100k powertrain warranty. No wonder Fisker uses that engine in the Karma.
You're assuming I've never driven the new V6 Mustang, yes? You'd be wrong.
Sounded to me like he thinks you probably haven't driven a C6.

