Bowling4Bikes
Steee-riiike!
mmm, yea okay
i would say it's better to not post and be thought of as a fool rather than post anyways and remove all doubt, but it's no longer applicable
agreed
mmm, yea okay
i would say it's better to not post and be thought of as a fool rather than post anyways and remove all doubt, but it's no longer applicable
both claims try to elevate man beyond that of what he is, a simple animal
mmm, yea okay
i would say it's better to not post and be thought of as a fool rather than post anyways and remove all doubt, but it's no longer applicable

The correct title to this thread should have been:"What will it take to change your behavior and lifestyle given your awareness of climate change?"
Nope. If we all went hippy it wouldn't really make a difference. It would just slightly extend the time we'll be extracting shale oil until hydrocarbon fuel is no longer available. It would move the needle, sure. But probably not enough to really matter.
What we need is to overcome the incredibly well-funded propaganda campaign that has people actually believing there is a "scientific debate" about climate change. Once people understand that the only dissent comes from propagandists and the blind sheep they've fooled, then they can start to process the scope and severity of the problem.
This is an issue we engineered ourselves into, and we have to engineer our way out. It will take R&D and investment from the public and private sectors. It will take willingness of greedy politicians to end the graft and subsidy of the fossil fuel industry. We have most of the tech we need already. It just requires courage to stand up to industry to change the course we are on.
Nope. If we all went hippy it wouldn't really make a difference. It would just slightly extend the time we'll be extracting shale oil until hydrocarbon fuel is no longer available. It would move the needle, sure. But probably not enough to really matter.
What we need is to overcome the incredibly well-funded propaganda campaign that has people actually believing there is a "scientific debate" about climate change. Once people understand that the only dissent comes from propagandists and the blind sheep they've fooled, then they can start to process the scope and severity of the problem.
This is an issue we engineered ourselves into, and we have to engineer our way out. It will take R&D and investment from the public and private sectors. It will take willingness of greedy politicians to end the graft and subsidy of the fossil fuel industry. We have most of the tech we need already. It just requires courage to stand up to industry to change the course we are on.
Well said, sir.
I started this thread to see if it was even possible to change a denier's mind. It is not. I just wake it up every so often to see if mounting evidence will turn a mind or two around.
Continuously posting the temperature on a single given day in a specific place only hurts your argument and makes the idea of man made climate change seem well beyond your understanding. If there is a record low somewhere in the world does that mean the planet is cooling?



This.
It really does undermine your arguments.
The problem with CC is that it's all done with computer models, that have had to have serious corrections in the last few years.
There is simply not enough objective data to measure CC. This should be measured in many decades, if not centuries.
Don't get me started about data collection methods etc etc. Most of it is total bullshit, and can be easily manipulated.![]()
The problem is that's NOT how it's all done. Models are a small part of the total picture. Most of the work is field and lab work.
What "data collection methods" are you referring to that are so problematic?
It's -9 degrees in Barrow, Alaska right now
mmm, yea okay
i would say it's better to not post and be thought of as a fool rather than post anyways and remove all doubt, but it's no longer applicable
Nope. If we all went hippy it wouldn't really make a difference. It would just slightly extend the time we'll be extracting shale oil until hydrocarbon fuel is no longer available. It would move the needle, sure. But probably not enough to really matter.
What we need is to overcome the incredibly well-funded propaganda campaign that has people actually believing there is a "scientific debate" about climate change. Once people understand that the only dissent comes from propagandists and the blind sheep they've fooled, then they can start to process the scope and severity of the problem.
This is an issue we engineered ourselves into, and we have to engineer our way out. It will take R&D and investment from the public and private sectors. It will take willingness of greedy politicians to end the graft and subsidy of the fossil fuel industry. We have most of the tech we need already. It just requires courage to stand up to industry to change the course we are on.
It will take an oil crash, simply put. We are going all the way on this one.
Example" My neighbor pulls up in his F950 diesel and runs into the house leaving the truck running for nearly 20 minutes before he jumps in and punches the accelerator sending a big ass plume of smoke. No - we're going all the way.