• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

When guns become a fetish.

The prohibited persons list SHOULD be retroactive. As in, if someone commits a serious crime they look through the registration list as you are now prohibited from owning any guns, and they confiscate them.

The problem is the never ending increasing list of "serious crimes", which as in Ant's case - aren't serious at all. Enough is enough.

If it's not a felony conviction then it wasn't serious, or at least the government couldn't prove it was.

Of course they do, Antarius.

It's a rational fear, too -- who do you think is going to be first up against the wall when the revolution comes?

:laughing

But why would there be a revolution if the politicians actually represented the people, and that they are elected to represent?
 
Last edited:
That's crazy talk, bojangle.

You're supposed to line your pockets and help out your pals!
 
Totally agree. A law doing exactly that was introduced this year in CA, then pulled.

As I said, I've gone from being willing to risk that and requiring registration for the purpose of things like the prohibited persons list, to being unwilling to register or support registration of anything.

The state has shown that they know no limits on how far they will push to disarm the public -- those of which I am not the least bit afraid of during my duties -- and as such I am no longer willing to compromise AT ALL in regards to gun control. Not one bit.

Worst of all, they do it in round about ways like growing the prohibited persons lists, denying handguns based on "safety," defining assault weapons so broadly as to affect nearly any semi auto rifle, etc. Its slimy, unethical, crooked shit.

At least if they had the balls to say "all guns are illegal" I'd respect their courage and passion, but no, they don't even have the nuts to flat out admit what they really want.

THEY, the politicians, FEAR an armed public. The cops don't, the firemen don't, an educated public doesn't, but our politicians? Oh yes, they most certainly do.

The politicians aren't afraid. It's their constituents, terrified soccer moms, who they are trying to placate with this pap. They're politicians, nothing the law says affects them.
 
Thoughts?

Well.

Girls_and_Guns.jpg
 
Telling me my story was fabricated? Why not just call me a liar.

I read that guys post the same as Roman did. His comment on registration does not lead to confiscation was sarcastic.
 
I didn't mean any as in every misdemeanor. Just certain ones, but the list keeps growing. Like Roman said, the latest attempt is to ban firearms for a misdemeanor DUI conviction. WTF does getting a DUI have to do with violence or 2A rights? Answer: absofuckinlutely nothing! My opinion is that no misdemeanor should ever result in losing firearm rights...even violent misdemeanors. I'm Ok with felonies though. Felony = State or Federal Prison time (or at least it used to).

I have a non-violent , non prison felony conviction. You mean, you think that some on that has a violence related misdemeanor, should still be allowed firearms? I don't agree with that at all.
 
Nice shit storm of a thread title.
 
So somebody who is involved in a fist fight should not be able to ever own guns again?

I was involved in a motorcycle chase, I haven't been able to own a gun for 10 years. What's worse, beating someone's ass, or outrunning the cops and embarrassing them?
 
I was involved in a motorcycle chase, I haven't been able to own a gun for 10 years. What's worse, beating someone's ass, or outrunning the cops and embarrassing them?

Sounds like they got the last laugh :twofinger
 
I was involved in a motorcycle chase, I haven't been able to own a gun for 10 years. What's worse, beating someone's ass*, or outrunning the cops and embarrassing them?

*Results may vary
 
They were pissed because I smoked them. They had to come to
my house to get me.

What do you mean self imposed out of guilt? And its strange, but they let me vote. And least they didn't find any dope.
 
Last edited:
They were pissed because I smoked them. They had to come to
my house to get me.

What do you mean self imposed out of guilt? And its strange, but they let me vote. And least they didn't find any dope.

Well I guess you never did say you got away. :laughing
 
Well I guess you never did say you got away. :laughing

They didn't "catch" me. I did "get away", for about 1/2 an hour. But that doesn't count. Of course, I haven't tried to buy a gun since then, maybe they'll let me. I talked to my lawyer about modification to a misdemeanor, he said, depends on the DA (whether they are opposed to it or not), my record since then (completely clean), and whether I violated probation back then (nope, never). And if I give him money, he'll take care of it. Maybe this year, we'll see.
 
They were pissed because I smoked them. They had to come to
my house to get me.

What do you mean self imposed out of guilt? And its strange, but they let me vote. And least they didn't find any dope.

I thought there was no voter fraud though? :rofl
 
You're talking out your ass.

If you are prohibited from owning a firearm and try to register it expect a visit.
I have a binder of documentation and paperwork here at home for anyone wishing to come see it.

Except you.

he has said it, but i will chime in.

i read this as sarcasm too.

because registration never ever leads to confiscation(according to the people who require registration and later confiscate)

you are lying about this story because it is impossible.
 
Back
Top