• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

California Assault Weapon Registration

no offense to anyone intended, but am curious and have a question. for all of you that own assault weapons, what is it you normally do with them (shooting-wise)?

I don't own assault weapons, but I used to own firearms that California labels as such until I lost them in a tragic boating accident.

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zP_fXqNea2Y
[/YOUTUBE]

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tJe97kUyzg[/YOUTUBE]

That's about it. : |
 
no offense to anyone intended, but am curious and have a question. for all of you that own assault weapons, what is it you normally do with them (shooting-wise)?

Hunt hogs, turkey and home defense with my sporting rifles.

AR 10 for hogs

AR 15 for turkey and home defense.

Not offended, it's a legitimate question.
 
no offense to anyone intended, but am curious and have a question. for all of you that own assault weapons, what is it you normally do with them (shooting-wise)?

Its not an assault weapon, seeing as I haven't assaulted anyone with it. It's simply a rifle and I take it to the range to punch holes in paper. Really though, in the event that a zombie apocalypse breaks outs, it gives me a fighting chance to at least delay the inevitable.
 
no offense to anyone intended, but am curious and have a question. for all of you that own assault weapons, what is it you normally do with them (shooting-wise)?

I've been a competitive shooter with Garands, M14s, and AR15s for over 30 years. These guns are required to compete in the National Matches. I'm in the process of building a new one right now.

This is my current rifle: What you can't see is that this gun is made strictly for target shooting and weighs 14.5 pounds, a lot of guys have 18 pound guns, those feel like they are bolted to the ground.

Arivaca-20160919-00200.jpg

P.S. It's only an Assault Weapon in California, where I live it's a sporting rifle (We can buy real assault weapons where I live but this isn't one)
 
Last edited:
no offense to anyone intended, but am curious and have a question. for all of you that own assault weapons, what is it you normally do with them (shooting-wise)?

If you are referring to the California definition of "assault weapon", it is nothing more than a fake emotionally charged word for "just another rifle". They would be used for the things any other rifle would be used for.
 
I've been a competitive shooter with Garands, M14s, and AR15s for over 30 years. These guns are required to compete in the National Matches.

Good point, is that the AR-15 took over from the M1A as the winning rifle to have in Service Rifle competitions. And Service Rifle requires civilian versions of military rifles with few modifications, so you can't Californicate it and still compete.

AR-15s also rule 3-gun competition.

When you outlaw certain firearm features and magazine capacity you are effectively ending some firearm competition. Like saying motorcycles with more than one cylinder and fuel tanks greater than two gallons capacity are illegal.
 
So I just had a lengthy drunken conversation with a lawyer friend and he says he doesn't think this quite falls under ex post facto.
Your lawyer friend is right.

Banning something, starting at some future date (the way this works), isn't ex post facto: it gives you an opportunity to not break the law (by disposing of said something first).

Ex post facto is when they criminalize something after you do it.
 
They should ban all 251cc+ motorcycles. No one needs more power than that. Require the owners to turn them in. It makes sense given how much society must pay for a few peoples' vanity.
 
I think all cars that go above 70mph should be banned. Have been keeping a tally of women, men and children who have been murdered (the last family burned alive in their car) by DUI drivers makes me want to outlaw alcohol as well considering drunks kill hundreds of people every year in this state alone.
 
If you're going featureless, I'd strongly recommend the Featureless Arms grip. I like it more than any other featureless option I've tried.
 
I've been a competitive shooter with Garands, M14s, and AR15s for over 30 years. These guns are required to compete in the National Matches. I'm in the process of building a new one right now.

This is my current rifle: What you can't see is that this gun is made strictly for target shooting and weighs 14.5 pounds, a lot of guys have 18 pound guns, those feel like they are bolted to the ground.

View attachment 500645

P.S. It's only an Assault Weapon in California, where I live it's a sporting rifle (We can buy real assault weapons where I live but this isn't one)

Not that I can have one but that stock looks awesome with the A3 upper config. Who makes it?
 
Just gonna leave this here.

https://radioviceonline.com/departm...rt-rifle-ar-15-suitable-for-personal-defense/
The United States Department of Homeland Security has stated a rifle chambered in 5.56 NATO (compatible with .223) with a magazine capacity of 30 rounds is “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters…”

This RFP is not for the traditional armed forces. This solicitation is specific to law enforcement who almost exclusively work within and along the borders of the United States. Certainly the threats ICE officers may be subject to are the same exact threats law-abiding residents could be subject to.

DHS said:
The scope of this contract is to provide a total of up to 7,000 5.56x45mm North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) personal defense weapons (PDW) throughout the life of this contract to numerous Department of Homeland Security components. …
In paragraph 3.1 under requirements and testing standards we read…
DHS said:
DHS and its components have a requirement for a 5.56x45mm NATO, select-fire firearm suitable for personal defense use in close quarters and/or when maximum concealment is required.
In requirement paragraph 3.9.10, they find a need for a 30-round magazine.
DHS said:
The action shall be capable of accepting all standard NATO STANAG 20 and 30 round M16 magazines (NSN 1005-00-921-5004) and Magpul 30 round PMAG (NSN 1005-01-576-5159). The magazine well shall be designed to allow easy insertion of a magazine.

The actual requisition order:
https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=d791b6aa0fd9d3d8833b2efa08300033&tab=core&_cview=0
 
looks like the Magpul UBR to me

De Facto standard for a service rifle. The rules permit adjustable length but require a fixed cheek piece. The UBR fit the bill. Fully extended for prone and we can click it shorter for standing and keep a good head position.
 
I will be registering 2 of my ARs and possibly my Yugo NPAP (although its currently in featureless configuration) that I bought in 2016. Mainly because California already knows I own them. I still debating on whether I should serialize my AR pistol then register or just destroy the lower and sell off the other parts. Converting them to featureless to me would just be a delaying tactic for gun owners. Sooner or later California will figure out that they're still selling a crap load of ARs despite their best efforts in the state and go after that "loop-hole", too. And before you can say "Hey, that means you'd have to ban ALL semi automatic rifles!" I think that's the goal eventually
 
De Facto standard for a service rifle. The rules permit adjustable length but require a fixed cheek piece. The UBR fit the bill. Fully extended for prone and we can click it shorter for standing and keep a good head position.
that's exactly why I like having an adjustable stock. Too bad it's an evil feature, even though it's legal if fixed in any of the positions.
 
They should ban all 251cc+ motorcycles. No one needs more power than that. Require the owners to turn them in. It makes sense given how much society must pay for a few peoples' vanity.
Hell, they should ban all beers over 1%, all wines over 2% and all liquors over 25%! :laughing

Require all owners to turn in their wines, liquor and beers that don't conform, just imagine all the lives it would save!
 
De Facto standard for a service rifle. The rules permit adjustable length but require a fixed cheek piece. The UBR fit the bill. Fully extended for prone and we can click it shorter for standing and keep a good head position.

I needed a cheek riser but had some very limited requirements for length of pull. I went with the ACS but may have chosen that one had I known about it.
 
the CA gov keeps chomping at law abiding citizens' 2A rights.

yet they now want to reduce sentences of criminals who commit crimes with guns.


source: LA times

url: http://www.latimes.com/politics/ess...ges-discretion-over-1507764214-htmlstory.html


Gov. Jerry Brown on Wednesday signed a bill that allows judges to decide against imposing prison sentencing enhancements of 10 or more years in cases where firearms are used in committing a felony.

State Sen. Steven Bradford (D-Gardena) introduced the measure, saying public safety is not served by the current mandate for enhancements, which come in the form of an additional sentence of 10 years, 20 years or life in prison.

“Far too many people of color are disproportionately impacted by our state’s overly punitive sentencing laws, which tie the hands of our judges,” Bradford said after the signing. “We must provide judges with the same level of discretion at sentencing as we afford prosecutors when filing charges.”

The governor drew criticism Wednesday from state Senate Republican leader Patricia Bates of Laguna Niguel for signing the measure a little more than a week after a gunman killed 58 people in Las Vegas.

“In light of the Las Vegas massacre, it makes no sense for the governor to sign a bill that would give judges the ability to reduce sentences for criminals who use guns,” Bates said. “Any criminal who used a gun to terrorize individuals, families and communities deserves the maximum sentence available.”

Brown acted, his office said, to “restore the power of judges to impose criminal sentences.”

The measure was opposed by some criminal justice leaders including Michele Hanisee, president of the Assn. of Deputy District Attorneys, which represents 1,000 prosecutors for Los Angeles County.

“The illegal use of guns to kill or wound innocent victims is a tragic story that occurs far too often,” Hanisee said recently in urging a veto. “Mandatory punishment for using a gun during a violent crime is right and just.”
 
Good ole' Gavin N. is on the radio talking about how great California is with it's common sense gun laws to save lives!
 
Back
Top