ob1ventura
Active member
..but the bad ones are BAAAADDD. Kinda like Kawi's and Harley's in that respect.

..but the bad ones are BAAAADDD. Kinda like Kawi's and Harley's in that respect.

I haven't screwed with things on a fuel-injected or fairly modern bike, but wouldn't seriously lean conditions make themselves known with detonation or rotten throttle response? (Written with the tone of "I'm curious", not "you're wrong".)
Does anyone know of this issue happening with a stock exhaust system? Me thinks the the previous posts concerning lean fueling being exacerbated by aftermarket exhausts and no remapping are spot on.
when I look at the Dynojet maps, it is not at low RPMS or High RPMs where the lean condition is happening...the Dynojet maps actually REMOVE quite a bit of fuel high in the rev range...
This is very common in the car world as well...extra fuel to keep things cool when people max out the engine. I'm sure some "tuners" think that will keep their turbo engine happy...until they run out of fuel pump capacity...POP!
In the midrange, you're fighting for fuel economy, and in the range that may be tested for emissions as well.
To me, it's tremendously sad that manufacturers don't put in functionality to deal with people swapping out pipes and modding airboxes. I mean...they know you're going to ride in the cold and give you heated grips right? I know it adds cost, but on a gizmo laden bike, the fact that the engine can't deal with minor mods well...sucks. But it's not like they're alone in that, and it would add some cost so...
I sure understand the need to fight for market share and all that...but to let your reputation for building reliable, well engineered stuff get lost in the process? People have no pride in their work...at least the executives...I wouldn't be surprised if the engineers were disgusted at what they are asked to do. I hope they are!
WTF
The bike has a full exhaust system that probably wasn't tuned for the bike. It's an illegal system. How is BMW in any shape or form mandated to provide customer support for illegal street mods? IIRC the OP bought the bike with the full illegal system and it was installed by a dealer. IMHO responsibility is with the installing shop and the OP. BMW provided the platform. Others decided to change the engineering and screwed up. BMWNA might help out for name sake but IMO from this chair I don't see any liability for them.
This is just another example of no personal responsibility and the entitlement attitude.
This is just another example of no personal responsibility and the entitlement attitude.

No it's an example of you sniffing glue I think...
It's not about that they should be mandated, it's about they pretend to be "high tech" but their engine isn't flexible enough to tune itself around relatively small changes in airflow. Come on, what does a pipe get you on a flowbench, 5%?
It's not like I expect an engine to deal with someone slapping a turbo on it, but come on, we're talking about a pipe and air filter here. Something commonly done by customers. I'm not up on engine management stuff anymore, but everyone always goes as cheap as they can on that stuff. I'm sure it's possible, and customers would see it not only as a good value, but a demonstration of technology, which is much of what BMW marketing is about.
also, it would be nice if the engine could tell when things like clogged injectors happened, and shut down at least that cylinder to avoid damage...little upsides like that.
It's not about that they should be mandated, it's about they pretend to be "high tech" but their engine isn't flexible enough to tune itself around relatively small changes in airflow. Come on, what does a pipe get you on a flowbench, 5%?
It's not like I expect an engine to deal with someone slapping a turbo on it, but come on, we're talking about a pipe and air filter here. Something commonly done by customers. I'm not up on engine management stuff anymore, but everyone always goes as cheap as they can on that stuff. I'm sure it's possible, and customers would see it not only as a good value, but a demonstration of technology, which is much of what BMW marketing is about. .
WTF
The bike has a full exhaust system that probably wasn't tuned for the bike. It's an illegal system. How is BMW in any shape or form mandated to provide customer support for illegal street mods? IIRC the OP bought the bike with the full illegal system and it was installed by a dealer. IMHO responsibility is with the installing shop and the OP. BMW provided the platform. Others decided to change the engineering and screwed up. BMWNA might help out for name sake but IMO from this chair I don't see any liability for them.
This is just another example of no personal responsibility and the entitlement attitude.

The OP said the same thing happened to his brother. I didn't hear if the brother had a full system too. To me it would be more than a coincidence.
I'm guessing that the limiting factors are...
...They are probably running even leaner than brilliant asses in Sacto mandate but while there may be long term damage they are not droping valves.
I'm guessing that the limiting factors are; CARB, EPA, and the need to generate a profit (cost of complying with regulations AND creating "work-arounds" would end up on the wrong side of the "cost vs benefit" equation)
Umm - it's my understanding that the exhaust system was actually listed in the BMW accessory catalog, and then sold and installed by the BMW dealer. So much for your fun rant...![]()
My bike was completely stock.
Before or after you took off the aftermarket equipment?
It may have been listed in a catalog but was it installed and tuned correctly? Was it a street legal exhaust system? No, I highly doubt it.

Whats confusing about 3 different engines powering 25 different bikes?![]()
What's confusing about Harley's? V-twin, makes a lot more noise than power, marks it's territory, most have only 100-200 miles of use, and the rider is usually underskilled and overweight.