Climber
Well-known member
The rate payers have no say in who PG&E chooses as subcontractors, so it's 100% PG&E's responsibility to assure that the subcontractors are doing their job properly.I think PG&E has been held liable and then it's up to them to go after whomever. I don't know about the details of their cases, but they certainly didn't invent the game of fingerpointing in the courtroom.
Just think up some parallels where you sell a product which uses other products and then for that third party company to have an issue which negatively affects your product. Something you've used a hundred times and had no reason to think anything would change, then one day it does. Totally outside of your control. You feel morally responsible? If you did, it'd be artificially self imposed, imo. You can feel bad because it sucks, but I'm generally unable to feel responsible for things other people do that are outside of my control.
Also, PG&E has a long, long history of short-changing maintenance and pocketing the money paid to them by rate payers to do that maintenance.
I don't understand why you're bending over backwards so far to defend them. Do you have any kind of personal or family stake in the business?

