Bay Arean
Well-known member
yeah, I don't see how you can not believe in the concept of evil, unless you don't believe in a concept of good. We live in a duality, that creates the definition and tension of the two. You can't wish it away or philosophize it away.
That's why some of the gnostics felt that this world is extremely flawed and that our God Jehovah (can't remember alternate name) was an evil being that created it without divine authority or permission, sort of an imperfect, bastardized level of creation. It helped them understand the cruelty of nature, the violence of earthquakes and other natural events. When you read these long-version creation myths, it makes Genesis look like the court reporter's version of events. He was a jealous god because he was a flawed god, etc etc. If you like such things, gets the Gnostic Bible, edited by Marvin Meyer.
On the one hand, the Gnostics seemed to want to Greek-ify everything by coming up with these elaborate explanations of levels of creation and such. But, once having been exposed to them, Genesis makes more sense, because you realize it was simplified, dumbed down and clumsily at that (there are actually two parts where woman is created, which I never understood, for example). But they definitely explored the concepts of good and evil as such...
Online:
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html
That's why some of the gnostics felt that this world is extremely flawed and that our God Jehovah (can't remember alternate name) was an evil being that created it without divine authority or permission, sort of an imperfect, bastardized level of creation. It helped them understand the cruelty of nature, the violence of earthquakes and other natural events. When you read these long-version creation myths, it makes Genesis look like the court reporter's version of events. He was a jealous god because he was a flawed god, etc etc. If you like such things, gets the Gnostic Bible, edited by Marvin Meyer.
On the one hand, the Gnostics seemed to want to Greek-ify everything by coming up with these elaborate explanations of levels of creation and such. But, once having been exposed to them, Genesis makes more sense, because you realize it was simplified, dumbed down and clumsily at that (there are actually two parts where woman is created, which I never understood, for example). But they definitely explored the concepts of good and evil as such...
Online:
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html
Last edited:
