What is Waymo surveilling?
Incomprehensible amounts of data collected and analyzed by confidently incompetent humans means that the vast majority of us will be fine, save for an extremely unlucky few. Which really means.....nothing has changed.
The design of this place is such that a bar or cakeshop can be pieces of shit and if society doesn't like it, they take their business elsewhere, but the fact of the matter is that we're saturated with pieces of shit, so it's most often not enough to change anything (masterpiece cakeshop is still in business and gets 4.2 stars on google reviews btw). Forced kindness is not the design and discrimination laws violate the design, even if that effort comes from a good place.
I'm not even sure what to takeaway from, "do not forget...". Is it that the shop denied service, that the shop was sued, that the shop won, that society likes discrimination and helps them be successful, or maybe something else? We do have a larger area to discriminate....as we should, because that's the design of how the hierarchy of rights works by domain. We have no rights here on barf because this is not our domain, and if it were our domain, then our right to run it as we see fit is supposed to be protected.
Pretty sure that, whoever "they" are, they already have a good idea if you're gay or poor and your affiliations from your social media posts. Google, "history of mass surveillance in the united states". Or, maybe they don't. Maybe you googled freddie mercury and ramen within ten seconds of each other and they think you're gay and broke, who knows. Too much data mixed with incompetence and corruption, the more things change..
California does have the most robust privacy laws in the country (at least as of 5 years ago - thatās when i left the field - others may have caught up by now). you skipped over the part he mentioned about āthe expectation of privacyā. itās a carve out in the law. when youāre out in āpublicā, thereās none (kinda the definition of āpublicā). with regard to selling information collected by those cameras, california law requires a data broker to offer opt out for anyone over 16, and opt in for anyone under that. it also provides for the right to sue in the event that provision in the law is violated. not perfect by any stretch, but the protection trajectory has at least been going in the right direction (in our state).
under california law, āopt outā doesnāt expire. what you are likely referring to is - after 12 months, you can be contacted by a business with a request to āopt inā. ignore it, and your āopt outā remains in force. data brokers differ in that if you āopt outā, they are required to permanently delete your contact information.Last time I looked into this, your "opt out" expires every year or two, or anytime you experience a "life change" (like a new address, phone, or job).
Some brokers also disguise themselves by posing as some kind of blog, hoping that when you see it you'll think you made a mistake and leave before you find the page with the opt-out instructions.![]()
I recently called SSA to sign up for medicare, I was stunned by the amount of things they know about me. Now that DOGE has pulled all that info from the government and given it to who knows whom, well let's just say you have no secrets.
The controlling majority wants this transition from public govt to private govt where they're just a small admin service that feeds public funds directly to private companies which monetize everything for profit including our data. I remember el dirty saying that we have exactly the govt we want. Which means, there's nothing to oppose. You're just of the minority opinion. Bunmer.
Should I start mooning them?They have 29 cameras per Waymo. Claims to not offer surveillance services, yeah, right.