Another forum I participate in had a similar thread this summer (as BARF has had many times before). The OP wanted to know if he needed the latest, greatest, liter+ version of the model in question. He was concerned that he might be shortchanging himself if he didn't get all the latest upgrades. Some folks urged him to get an older version, or a smaller version, or a dual-sport as referenced above. Others just enabled the OP's desire to have the coolest bike possible. He went with the enablers and bought the latest, greatest.
That was April. So far as I know, he has wadded the bike twice (both single vehicle crashes that were the OP's fault). It now has a salvage title, and the OP is wondering if motorcycling is just too dangerous, probably because his co-workers have told him this. At no time has the OP taken any responsibility for his original choice, or his overall lack of competence as a rider. He has been counseled to take advanced riding courses, etc., but he's either too busy or they cost too much, yada-yada. BTW, the bike in question has VASTLY less power than either of the bike you're asking about.
So, if the tone of some to the posts seem harsh and critical, it's because the posters have seen this before, and suspect that the question being asked is so silly that it must be a joke. You are sticking to your original story and suggesting that it's not a joke, so now the temptation is just to conclude that you're doomed, and the only way you're likely to get them to think otherwise is to catch a clue.
Good luck,